Current Biotechnology ›› 2026, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (4): 909-918.DOI: 10.19586/j.2095-2341.2025.0159
• Reviews • Previous Articles Next Articles
Mingdi ZHANG1(
), Qigai LI2(
), Lu WANG2, Hui OUYANG2, Jinghua LIAN2, Fei XIE1(
)
Received:2025-11-17
Accepted:2026-01-21
Online:2026-07-25
Published:2026-09-11
Contact:
Fei XIE
CLC Number:
Mingdi ZHANG, Qigai LI, Lu WANG, Hui OUYANG, Jinghua LIAN, Fei XIE. Research Advances and Clinical Application Prospects of in Vivo CAR-T Therapy[J]. Current Biotechnology, 2026, 16(4): 909-918.
| 载体类型 | 核心特性 | 在体内CAR-T中的优势 | 局限性 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 腺相关病毒(AAV) | 非致病性、单链DNA、多数无整合能力、血清型特异性靶向(如AAV6靶向T细胞) | 安全性高、T细胞靶向性强、表达稳定性好 | 装载容量有限(约4.7 kb)、免疫原性问题(如预存抗体) |
| 慢病毒(LV) | 逆转录病毒科、整合型、感染分裂与非分裂细胞、整合位点随机 | 长期表达能力强、装载容量较大(约 8 kb)、感染效率高 | 插入突变风险、生产难度大、免疫原性较强 |
| 逆转录病毒(RV) | 仅感染分裂期细胞、整合效率高、整合位点偏好转录起始区域 | 整合效率高、技术成熟度高 | 细胞周期依赖性强、插入致癌风险高、装载容量有限(约6 kb) |
Table 1 Comparison of 3 mainstream viral vectors in CAR-T therapy in vivo
| 载体类型 | 核心特性 | 在体内CAR-T中的优势 | 局限性 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 腺相关病毒(AAV) | 非致病性、单链DNA、多数无整合能力、血清型特异性靶向(如AAV6靶向T细胞) | 安全性高、T细胞靶向性强、表达稳定性好 | 装载容量有限(约4.7 kb)、免疫原性问题(如预存抗体) |
| 慢病毒(LV) | 逆转录病毒科、整合型、感染分裂与非分裂细胞、整合位点随机 | 长期表达能力强、装载容量较大(约 8 kb)、感染效率高 | 插入突变风险、生产难度大、免疫原性较强 |
| 逆转录病毒(RV) | 仅感染分裂期细胞、整合效率高、整合位点偏好转录起始区域 | 整合效率高、技术成熟度高 | 细胞周期依赖性强、插入致癌风险高、装载容量有限(约6 kb) |
| 载体类型 | 核心特性 | 在体内CAR-T中的优势 | 局限性 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 脂质纳米颗粒(LNP) | 核-壳结构,包裹mRNA/DNA;通过内吞进入细胞,酸性环境中结构变化实现内体逃逸[ | 生物相容性好、递送效率较高、技术成熟度高 | 靶向性有限、表达周期短、规模化生产成本较高 |
| 聚合物纳米载体 | 阳离子聚合物与核酸静电结合;通过内吞进入,部分聚合物可促进内体逃逸[ | 负载能力强、结构可设计性高、生产成本低 | 细胞毒性较高、递送效率不稳定、内体逃逸效率低 |
| DNA纳米载体 | DNA自组装形成纳米结构,可包裹CAR基因;尺寸可控,生物相容性好 | 靶向精度高、生物安全性优、功能模块化 | 制备难度大、体内稳定性差、转染效率低 |
Table 2 Comparison of three mainstream non viral vectors in CAR-T therapy in vivo
| 载体类型 | 核心特性 | 在体内CAR-T中的优势 | 局限性 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 脂质纳米颗粒(LNP) | 核-壳结构,包裹mRNA/DNA;通过内吞进入细胞,酸性环境中结构变化实现内体逃逸[ | 生物相容性好、递送效率较高、技术成熟度高 | 靶向性有限、表达周期短、规模化生产成本较高 |
| 聚合物纳米载体 | 阳离子聚合物与核酸静电结合;通过内吞进入,部分聚合物可促进内体逃逸[ | 负载能力强、结构可设计性高、生产成本低 | 细胞毒性较高、递送效率不稳定、内体逃逸效率低 |
| DNA纳米载体 | DNA自组装形成纳米结构,可包裹CAR基因;尺寸可控,生物相容性好 | 靶向精度高、生物安全性优、功能模块化 | 制备难度大、体内稳定性差、转染效率低 |
| 体外CAR-T疗法 | 体内CAR-T疗法 | |
|---|---|---|
| 技术流程 | ①白细胞分离术抽取患者外周血;②免疫磁珠分选分离T细胞;③GMP实验室病毒/非病毒载体介导CAR基因转染;④细胞因子(IL-2/IL-7)体外扩增(105→109~1010个);⑤质量检测(CAR表达率、活性、内毒素);⑥静脉回输患者体内 | ①规模化生产携带CAR基因的递送载体(AAV/LNP等);②载体质量检测(靶向性、基因包封率);③静脉/局部注射载体至患者体内;④载体体内靶向T细胞并实现CAR基因原位表达与T细胞改造 |
| 治疗周期 | 从抽血到回输需2~4周,T细胞数量不足/功能弱时可延长至6周,其间需桥接治疗控制肿瘤 | 载体可提前储存,患者确诊后1~2 d完成给药前评估,给药后1~3 d检测到CAR-T活性,总周期≤1周 |
| 治疗成本 | 单例成本30万~50万美元,核心成本:白细胞分离术(≈2万美元)、GMP细胞培养(≈10万美元)、病毒载体制备(≈15万美元)、质量检测(≈5万美元) | 单例成本有望降至5 万~10万美元,核心成本:规模化载体生产(LNP:1 000~5 000美元·剂-1;AAV:1万~3万美元·剂-1);无细胞分离/培养成本 |
| T细胞功能特性 | 体外培养易致T细胞耗竭:PD-1/LAG-3阳性率 60%~80%(新鲜T细胞仅10%~20%);体内存活时间2~4周;记忆T细胞比例 15%~20%,长期抗肿瘤记忆弱 | 体内生理环境保留T细胞功能,无明显耗竭标志物高表达;体内存活时间8~12周;记忆T细胞比例35%~45%,可动态改造新生T细胞,维持长期活性[ |
| 适用人群 | 仅30%~40%患者符合标准,排除以下人群:T细胞数量<1×105个·mL-1(老年/多次化疗患者);合并严重感染(活动性乙肝)、器官衰竭(肝功能Child-Pugh C级);无法耐受白细胞分离术 | 适用人群大幅拓展,可覆盖T细胞数量不足/功能弱的患者;合并轻度器官功能不全/感染的患者;实体瘤患者(肿瘤微环境内直接改造T细胞,减少迁移损耗) |
| 安全性风险 | ①主要毒性:CRS(3级及以上发生率20%~30%)、ICANS(3级及以上10%~15%)、B细胞耗竭;②毒性管理成熟:CRS用托珠单抗,ICANS用糖皮质激素,B细胞耗竭用免疫球蛋白[ | ①新型风险:载体脱靶感染(肝细胞/红细胞,致肝损伤等);基因编辑脱靶(潜在二次肿瘤风险);CAR-T活性难调控(可能引发过度炎症);②临床前数据:诱导CRS和CAR-T相关脑病综合征(神经毒性),长期安全性待验证[ |
| 技术成熟度 | 已实现临床转化,全球多款产品获批(如阿基仑赛、瑞基奥仑赛),临床数据丰富,质控标准明确 | 处于临床前/早期临床试验阶段,无获批产品,核心技术(载体靶向性、表达效率)仍需优化,长期疗效与安全性数据不足 |
Table 3 Comparison of in vitro CAR-T and in vivo CAR-T therapies[38]
| 体外CAR-T疗法 | 体内CAR-T疗法 | |
|---|---|---|
| 技术流程 | ①白细胞分离术抽取患者外周血;②免疫磁珠分选分离T细胞;③GMP实验室病毒/非病毒载体介导CAR基因转染;④细胞因子(IL-2/IL-7)体外扩增(105→109~1010个);⑤质量检测(CAR表达率、活性、内毒素);⑥静脉回输患者体内 | ①规模化生产携带CAR基因的递送载体(AAV/LNP等);②载体质量检测(靶向性、基因包封率);③静脉/局部注射载体至患者体内;④载体体内靶向T细胞并实现CAR基因原位表达与T细胞改造 |
| 治疗周期 | 从抽血到回输需2~4周,T细胞数量不足/功能弱时可延长至6周,其间需桥接治疗控制肿瘤 | 载体可提前储存,患者确诊后1~2 d完成给药前评估,给药后1~3 d检测到CAR-T活性,总周期≤1周 |
| 治疗成本 | 单例成本30万~50万美元,核心成本:白细胞分离术(≈2万美元)、GMP细胞培养(≈10万美元)、病毒载体制备(≈15万美元)、质量检测(≈5万美元) | 单例成本有望降至5 万~10万美元,核心成本:规模化载体生产(LNP:1 000~5 000美元·剂-1;AAV:1万~3万美元·剂-1);无细胞分离/培养成本 |
| T细胞功能特性 | 体外培养易致T细胞耗竭:PD-1/LAG-3阳性率 60%~80%(新鲜T细胞仅10%~20%);体内存活时间2~4周;记忆T细胞比例 15%~20%,长期抗肿瘤记忆弱 | 体内生理环境保留T细胞功能,无明显耗竭标志物高表达;体内存活时间8~12周;记忆T细胞比例35%~45%,可动态改造新生T细胞,维持长期活性[ |
| 适用人群 | 仅30%~40%患者符合标准,排除以下人群:T细胞数量<1×105个·mL-1(老年/多次化疗患者);合并严重感染(活动性乙肝)、器官衰竭(肝功能Child-Pugh C级);无法耐受白细胞分离术 | 适用人群大幅拓展,可覆盖T细胞数量不足/功能弱的患者;合并轻度器官功能不全/感染的患者;实体瘤患者(肿瘤微环境内直接改造T细胞,减少迁移损耗) |
| 安全性风险 | ①主要毒性:CRS(3级及以上发生率20%~30%)、ICANS(3级及以上10%~15%)、B细胞耗竭;②毒性管理成熟:CRS用托珠单抗,ICANS用糖皮质激素,B细胞耗竭用免疫球蛋白[ | ①新型风险:载体脱靶感染(肝细胞/红细胞,致肝损伤等);基因编辑脱靶(潜在二次肿瘤风险);CAR-T活性难调控(可能引发过度炎症);②临床前数据:诱导CRS和CAR-T相关脑病综合征(神经毒性),长期安全性待验证[ |
| 技术成熟度 | 已实现临床转化,全球多款产品获批(如阿基仑赛、瑞基奥仑赛),临床数据丰富,质控标准明确 | 处于临床前/早期临床试验阶段,无获批产品,核心技术(载体靶向性、表达效率)仍需优化,长期疗效与安全性数据不足 |
| [1] | ZHAI Y, HE K, HUANG L, et al.. DLK1-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Liver Int., 2022, 42(11): 2524-2537. |
| [2] | BUECHNER J, KERSTEN M J, FUCHS M, et al.. Chimeric antigen receptor-T cell therapy: practical considerations for implementation in Europe[J/OL]. HemaSphere, 2018, 2(1): e18[2025-09-25]. . |
| [3] | LAI M, SHAO W, MAO J, et al.. Revolution in cell therapy: in vivo chimeric-antigen-receptor-T-cell therapy breakthroughs and promises for the future[J/OL]. Res. Wash. D C, 2025, 8: 0917[2025-09-25]. . |
| [4] | ZUO Y H, ZHAO X P, FAN X X. Nanotechnology-based chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in treating solid tumor[J/OL]. Pharmacol. Res., 2022, 184: 106454[2025-09-25]. . |
| [5] | ISMAIL F S, GALLUS M, MEUTH S G, et al.. Current and future roles of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in neurology: a review[J]. JAMA Neurol., 2025, 82(1): 93-103. |
| [6] | MILLER M A. Nanoparticles improve economic mileage for CARs[J/OL]. Sci. Transl. Med., 2017, 9(387): eaan2784[2025-09-25]. . |
| [7] | FOSTER J B, BARRETT D M, KARIKÓ K. The emerging role of in vitro-transcribed mRNA in adoptive T cell immunotherapy[J]. Mol. Ther., 2019, 27(4): 747-756. |
| [8] | TAO R, HAN X, BAI X, et al.. Revolutionizing cancer treatment: enhancing CAR-T cell therapy with CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing technology[J/OL]. Front. Immunol., 2024, 15: 1354825[2025-09-25]. . |
| [9] | ZAKAS P M, CUNNINGHAM S C, DOHERTY A, et al.. Sleeping Beauty mRNA-LNP enables stable rAAV transgene expression in mouse and NHP hepatocytes and improves vector potency[J]. Mol. Ther., 2024, 32(10): 3356-3371. |
| [10] | BIMBO J F, VAN DIEST E, MURPHY D E, et al.. T cell-specific non-viral DNA delivery and in vivo CAR-T generation using targeted lipid nanoparticles[J/OL]. J. Immunother. Cancer, 2025, 13(7): e011759[2025-09-25]. . |
| [11] | YE X, GE M, TAN M, et al.. CD19-targeted CAR T therapy treating hematologic malignancies: hidden danger is the next neighbor to security?[J/OL]. Front. Immunol., 2025, 16: 1490491[2025-09-25]. . |
| [12] | GENG G, XU Y, HU Z, et al.. Viral and non-viral vectors in gene therapy: current state and clinical perspectives[J/OL]. EBioMedicine, 2025, 118: 105834[2025-09-25]. . |
| [13] | WANG D, ZHOU Q, QIU X, et al.. Optimizing rAAV6 transduction of primary T cells for the generation of anti-CD19 AAV-CAR-T cells[J/OL]. Biomed. Pharmacother., 2022, 150: 113027[2025-09-25]. . |
| [14] | ARJOMANDNEJAD M, DASGUPTA I, FLOTTE T R, et al.. Immunogenicity of recombinant adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors for gene transfer[J]. BioDrugs, 2023, 37(3): 311-329. |
| [15] | VINK C A, GASPAR H B, GABRIEL R, et al.. Sleeping beauty transposition from nonintegrating lentivirus[J]. Mol. Ther., 2009, 17(7): 1197-1204. |
| [16] | APOLONIA L, WADDINGTON S N, FERNANDES C, et al.. Stable gene transfer to muscle using non-integrating lentiviral vectors[J]. Mol. Ther., 2007, 15(11): 1947-1954. |
| [17] | RAUT S D, LEI P, PADMASHALI R M, et al.. Fibrin-mediated lentivirus gene transfer: implications for lentivirus microarrays[J]. J. Control. Release, 2010, 144(2): 213-220. |
| [18] | GILL S, JUNE C H. Going viral: chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for hematological malignancies[J]. Immunol. Rev., 2015, 263(1): 68-89. |
| [19] | BUSHMAN F D. Retroviral insertional mutagenesis in humans: evidence for four genetic mechanisms promoting expansion of cell clones[J]. Mol. Ther., 2020, 28(2): 352-356. |
| [20] | PINTO I S, CORDEIRO R A, FANECA H. Polymer- and lipid-based gene delivery technology for CAR T cell therapy[J]. J. Control. Release, 2023, 353: 196-215. |
| [21] | NIU H, ZHAO P, SUN W. Biomaterials for chimeric antigen receptor T cell engineering[J]. Acta Biomater., 2023, 166: 1-13. |
| [22] | HOU X, ZAKS T, LANGER R, et al.. Lipid nanoparticles for mRNA delivery[J]. Nat. Rev. Mater., 2021, 6(12): 1078-1094. |
| [23] | MALBURET C, LECLERCQ L, COTTE J F, et al.. Size and charge characterization of lipid nanoparticles for mRNA vaccines[J]. Anal. Chem., 2022, 94(11): 4677-4685. |
| [24] | MÉRIAN J, BOISGARD R, DECLEVES X, et al.. Synthetic lipid nanoparticles targeting steroid organs[J]. J. Nucl. Med., 2013, 54(11): 1996-2003. |
| [25] | ZHANG J, YANG X, CHANG Z, et al.. Polymeric nanocarriers for therapeutic gene delivery[J/OL]. Asian J. Pharm. Sci., 2025, 20(1): 101015[2025-09-25]. . |
| [26] | CAI X, DOU R, GUO C, et al.. Cationic polymers as transfection reagents for nucleic acid delivery[J/OL]. Pharmaceutics, 2023, 15(5): 1502[2025-09-25]. . |
| [27] | HARGUINDEY A, ROY S, HARRIS A W, et al.. Click nucleic acid mediated loading of prodrug activating enzymes in PEG-PLGA nanoparticles for combination chemotherapy[J]. Biomacromolecules, 2019, 20(4): 1683-1690. |
| [28] | CHAN M S, TAM D Y, DAI Z, et al.. Mitochondrial delivery of therapeutic agents by amphiphilic DNA nanocarriers[J]. Small Weinheim Der Bergstrasse Ger., 2016, 12(6): 770-781. |
| [29] | GYANANI V, GOSWAMI R. Key design features of lipid nanoparticles and electrostatic charge-based lipid nanoparticle targeting[J/OL]. Pharmaceutics, 2023, 15(4): 1184[2025-09-25]. . |
| [30] | CHAROENPHOL P, BERMUDEZ H. Design and application of multifunctional DNA nanocarriers for therapeutic delivery[J]. Acta Biomater., 2014, 10(4): 1683-1691. |
| [31] | VUORIMAA E, URTTI A, SEPPÄNEN R, et al.. Time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy reveals functional differences of cationic polymer-DNA complexes[J]. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130(35): 11695-11700. |
| [32] | ZHOU J E, SUN L, JIA Y, et al.. Lipid nanoparticles produce chimeric antigen receptor T cells with interleukin-6 knockdown in vivo [J]. J. Control. Release, 2022, 350: 298-307. |
| [33] | HU Y, ZHOU Y, ZHANG M, et al.. CRISPR/Cas9-engineered universal CD19/CD22 dual-targeted CAR-T cell therapy for relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia[J]. Clin. Cancer Res., 2021, 27(10): 2764-2772. |
| [34] | GUO J, TANG Q. Recent updates on chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Cancer Gene Ther., 2021, 28(10-11): 1075-1087. |
| [35] | BILLINGSLEY M M, SINGH N, RAVIKUMAR P, et al.. Ionizable lipid nanoparticle-mediated mRNA delivery for human CAR T cell engineering[J]. Nano Lett., 2020, 20(3): 1578-1589. |
| [36] | YANG C H, SHEN K Y, HO H M, et al.. Boosting DNA vaccine power by lipid nanoparticles surface engineered with amphiphilic bioresorbable copolymer[J/OL]. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids, 2024, 35(3): 102261[2025-09-25]. . |
| [37] | QASIM W. Genome-edited allogeneic donor "universal" chimeric antigen receptor T cells[J]. Blood, 2023, 141(8): 835-845. |
| [38] | LI Y R, ZHU Y, HALLADAY T, et al.. In vivo CAR engineering for immunotherapy[J]. Nat. Rev. Immunol., 2025, 25: 725-744. |
| [39] | YANG Z, WANG Y. Clinical development of chimeric antigen receptor-T cell therapy for hematological malignancies[J]. Chin. Med. J., 2023, 136(19): 2285-2296. |
| [40] | DHOLARIA B R, BACHMEIER C A, LOCKE F. Mechanisms and management of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy-related toxicities[J]. BioDrugs, 2019, 33(1): 45-60. |
| [41] | VO M C, TRAN V D, NGUYEN V T, et al.. Challenges and limitations of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies in solid tumors: why are approvals restricted to hematologic malignancies?[J/OL]. J. Hematol. Oncol., 2025, 18(1): 91[2025-09-25]. . |
| [42] | LEE M Y, ROBBINS Y, SIEVERS C, et al.. Chimeric antigen receptor engineered NK cellular immunotherapy overcomes the selection of T-cell escape variant cancer cells[J/OL]. J. Immunother. Cancer, 2021, 9(3): e002128[2025-09-25]. . |
| [43] | REPPEL L, TSAHOURIDIS O, AKULIAN J, et al.. Targeting disialoganglioside GD2 with chimeric antigen receptor-redirected T cells in lung cancer[J/OL]. J. Immunother. Cancer, 2022, 10(1): e003897[2025-09-25]. . |
| [44] | GALANOPOULOS M, DOUKATAS A, GKEROS F, et al.. Room for improvement in the treatment of pancreatic cancer: Novel opportunities from gene targeted therapy[J]. World J. Gastroenterol., 2021, 27(24): 3568-3580. |
| [45] | CHEN P, XIA Y, LEI W, et al.. Case report: Hashimoto's thyroiditis after CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy[J/OL]. Front. Immunol., 2022, 13: 995496[2025-09-25]. . |
| [46] | RUELLA M, KENDERIAN S S, SHESTOVA O, et al.. The addition of the BTK inhibitor ibrutinib to anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CART19) improves responses against mantle cell lymphoma[J]. Clin. Cancer Res., 2016, 22(11): 2684-2696. |
| [47] | ALCANTARA M, RUSQUEC P D, ROMANO E. Current clinical evidence and potential solutions to increase benefit of CAR T-cell therapy for patients with solid tumors[J/OL]. Oncoimmunology, 2020, 9(1): 1777064[2025-09-25]. . |
| [48] | ZHANG Y, WANG P, WANG T, et al.. Chimeric antigen receptor T cells engineered to secrete CD40 agonist antibodies enhance antitumor efficacy[J/OL]. J. Transl. Med., 2021, 19(1): 82[2025-09-25]. . |
| [49] | NIU H, ZHAO P, SUN W. Biomaterials for chimeric antigen receptor T cell engineering[J]. Acta Biomater., 2023, 166: 1-13. |
| [50] | DU J, LYU X, ZHANG Z, et al.. Revisiting targeted therapy and immunotherapy for advanced cholangiocarcinoma[J/OL]. Front. Immunol., 2023, 14: 1142690[2025-09-25]. . |
| [51] | LI X, ZHU T, WANG R, et al.. Genetically programmable vesicles for enhancing CAR-T therapy against solid tumors[J/OL]. Adv. Mater., 2023, 35(19): 2211138[2025-09-25]. . |
| [52] | REN J, ZHAO Y. Advancing chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy with CRISPR/Cas9[J]. Protein Cell, 2017, 8(9): 634-643. |
| [53] | DAI Z, MU W, ZHAO Y, et al.. T cells expressing CD5/CD7 bispecific chimeric antigen receptors with fully human heavy-chain-only domains mitigate tumor antigen escape[J/OL]. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther., 2022, 7(1): 85[2025-09-25]. . |
| [54] | KOTTERMAN M A, CHALBERG T W, SCHAFFER D V. Viral vectors for gene therapy: translational and clinical outlook[J]. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 2015, 17: 63-89. |
| [55] | LAM N, TRINKLEIN N D, BUELOW B, et al.. Anti-BCMA chimeric antigen receptors with fully human heavy-chain-only antigen recognition domains[J/OL]. Nat. Commun., 2020, 11(1): 283[2025-09-25]. . |
| [56] | TAN A H J, VINANICA N, CAMPANA D. Chimeric antigen receptor-T cells with cytokine neutralizing capacity[J]. Blood Adv., 2020, 4(7): 1419-1431. |
| [57] | KHANIYA A, RAD S M A H, HALPIN J, et al.. Development of a compact bidirectional promoter-driven dual chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) construct targeting CD19 and CD20 in the Sleeping Beauty (SB) transposon system[J/OL]. J. Immunother. Cancer, 2024, 12(4): e008555[2025-09-25]. . |
| [58] | GEORGIADIS C, PREECE R, QASIM W. Clinical development of allogeneic chimeric antigen receptor αβ-T cells[J]. Mol. Ther., 2025, 33(6): 2426-2440. |
| [59] | RURIK J G, TOMBÁCZ I, YADEGARI A, et al.. CAR T cells produced in vivo to treat cardiac injury[J]. Science, 2022, 375(6576): 91-96. |
| [60] | SRIVASTAVA S, SALTER A I, LIGGITT D, et al.. Logic-gated ROR1 chimeric antigen receptor expression rescues T cell-mediated toxicity to normal tissues and enables selective tumor targeting[J]. Cancer Cell, 2019, 35(3): 489-503. |
| [61] | DING C, SONG Z, SHEN A, et al.. Small molecules targeting the innate immune cGAS-STING-TBK1 signaling pathway[J]. Acta Pharm. Sin. B, 2020, 10(12): 2272-2298. |
| [62] | CHEN J, HNATH B, SHA C M, et al.. Optogenetically engineered Septin-7 enhances immune cell infiltration of tumor spheroids[J/OL]. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2024, 121(44): e2405717121[2025-09-25]. . |
| [63] | WATKINSON F, NAYAR S K, RANI A, et al.. IL-15 upregulates telomerase expression and potently increases proliferative capacity of NK, NKT-like, and CD8 T cells[J/OL]. Front. Immunol., 2020, 11: 594620[2025-09-25]. . |
| [64] | BORCHERDING N, BRESTOFF J R. The power and potential of mitochondria transfer[J]. Nature, 2023, 623(7986): 283-291. |
| [65] | GREEN H N, CROCKETT S D, MARTYSHKIN D V, et al.. A histological evaluation and in vivo assessment of intratumoral near infrared photothermal nanotherapy-induced tumor regression[J]. Int. J. Nanomed., 2014, 9: 5093-5102. |
| [66] | WANG Y, JIN S, ZHUANG Q, et al.. Chimeric antigen receptor natural killer cells: a promising antitumor immunotherapy[J/OL]. MedComm, 2023, 4(6): e422[2025-09-25]. . |
| [67] | GAO L, SHI C, YANG Z, et al.. Convection-enhanced delivery of nanoencapsulated gene locoregionally yielding ErbB2/Her2-specific CAR-macrophages for brainstem glioma immunotherapy[J/OL]. J. Nanobiotechnol., 2023, 21(1): 56[2025-09-25]. . |
| [1] | Yu GAO, Tianyi HAN, Xiaoyun HE, Nan CHENG, Weichen LIU, Wei FU, Kunlun HUANG, Hong CHEN. Research Progress on Multi-omics Systematic Analysis of Unintended Effects in Biotechnology-derived Breeding Products [J]. Current Biotechnology, 2026, 16(4): 732-743. |
| [2] | Tianyi HAN, Yu GAO, Nan CHENG, Xiaoyun HE, Weichen LIU, Wei FU, Kunlun HUANG, Hong CHEN. Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Safety Assessment of Biological Breeding Products [J]. Current Biotechnology, 2026, 16(4): 765-773. |
| [3] | Mengyao JIA, Deqin HU, Yuan LI, Dongmei WANG, Wei LU, Hongsheng PAN. Research Progress and Environmental Safety Assessment of Transgenic Cotton in China [J]. Current Biotechnology, 2026, 16(4): 774-785. |
| [4] | Xiaolin LIU, Qihui WANG. The Relationship Between the Expression Level of Ferroptosis-related Gene NCOA4 and Prognosis and Therapeutic Efficacy in Colon Cancer [J]. Current Biotechnology, 2026, 16(1): 178-189. |
| [5] | Xiaoyi ZHAI, Zhongqi DIAO, Yi CHEN, Wenjia GUO. Risk Modeling of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts and Associated Prognostic Features in Breast Cancer Patients Based on Single-cell RNA-seq and Bulk RNA-seq Data [J]. Current Biotechnology, 2025, 15(6): 1094-1107. |
| [6] | Yuqin BIAN, Keran DONG, Junzi LU, Enming ZHONG, Wanying GU, Jingshu ZHAO, Hongshu SUI. Clinical Progress in Targeted Therapy and Immunotherapy in Breast Cancer [J]. Current Biotechnology, 2025, 15(2): 234-240. |
| [7] | Ping YU, Di ZHAO, Xuejiao CHEN, Jia SONG, Haitao WANG, Xiangbo MIN. Study on Relieving Hyperuricemia and Gout Function by Limosilactobacillus reuteri HCS02-001 [J]. Current Biotechnology, 2024, 14(3): 473-479. |
| [8] | Yan ZENG, Hengcheng ZHU, Kang YANG. The Mechanism of DNASE1L3 in Renal Cell Carcinoma [J]. Current Biotechnology, 2024, 14(3): 486-491. |
| [9] | Lingyan LI, Bing XIAO, Xudong ZHANG, Hua ZHANG, Ziyan CHEN, Haoqian WANG, Xiujie ZHANG, Hong CHEN, Jingang LIANG. Establishment and Standardization of Real-time PCR Method for Qualitative Detection of Genetically Modified Maize MON87411 [J]. Current Biotechnology, 2024, 14(2): 257-262. |
| [10] | Yonghong ZHANG, Yanyi LI, Ronglin LIU, Na LYU, Weiting ZHANG. Application of IgY in the Field Antiviral Medical [J]. Current Biotechnology, 2024, 14(1): 35-41. |
| [11] | Yonghong ZHANG, Yanyi LI, Weiting ZHANG. Progress on Integration Site Analysis Technology [J]. Current Biotechnology, 2024, 14(1): 66-71. |
| [12] | Yingrui GAO, Fuzhong KANG, Tiejian MENG, Kefei LIU, Tiaotiao WANG, Jinyan CHEN, Tong SUN. Safety Evaluation of Clostridium butyricum Based on Whole Genome Sequencing [J]. Current Biotechnology, 2023, 13(5): 755-759. |
| [13] | Lang GAO, Sixue YU, Chunsen YUAN, Zhiwei SHAN, Pengxiang ZHAO. Research Progress of Mucin in Tumor Immunotherapy [J]. Current Biotechnology, 2023, 13(3): 390-398. |
| [14] | Enze CHENG-CHEN, Minghong JIA, Yueying LI. Research Progress of Nucleic Acid Reference Materials of Food-borne Pathogenic Bacteria [J]. Current Biotechnology, 2023, 13(2): 195-200. |
| [15] | Doudou LEI, Runran MA, Jiabo WANG, Weijun KONG. Research Progress on New Biological Detection Technology for Pesticide Residues in Foods [J]. Current Biotechnology, 2023, 13(1): 1-10. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||