Current Biotechnology ›› 2026, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (4): 853-862.DOI: 10.19586/j.2095-2341.2026.0041
• Special Forum on Detection Technology for Genetically Modified Organisms • Previous Articles Next Articles
Mei DONG1(
), Lixia MENG1, Tingting WEN1, Chaohua MIAO1, Wujun JIN1,2(
)
Received:2026-02-27
Accepted:2026-03-10
Online:2026-07-25
Published:2026-09-11
Contact:
Wujun JIN
CLC Number:
Mei DONG, Lixia MENG, Tingting WEN, Chaohua MIAO, Wujun JIN. Establishment of a Real-time Quantitative PCR Detection Method for Insect-resistant and Herbicide-tolerant Maize BBL2-2[J]. Current Biotechnology, 2026, 16(4): 853-862.
| 编号 | 引物探针组合 | 引物序列(5'→3') | 探针序列(5'→3') | 扩增片段大小/bp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5'F2/5'R1/5'P | 5'F2:5'-CGGCGGTCAACCAAACAA-3' | 5'P:5'-FAM-TCCCTGAGAGTCAACTGCCCC-BHQ1-3' | 165 |
| 5'R1:5'-ACATTAAAAACGTCCGCAAT-3' | ||||
| 2 | 5'F3/5'R1/5'P | 5'F3:5'-GTGATCTTGTTCGTTGTATTGG-3' | 5'P:5'-FAM-TCCCTGAGAGTCAACTGCCCC-BHQ1-3' | 102 |
| 5'R1:5'-ACATTAAAAACGTCCGCAAT-3' | ||||
| 3 | 5'F2/5'R2/5'P | 5'F2:5'-CGGCGGTCAACCAAACAA-3' | 5'P:5'-FAM-TCCCTGAGAGTCAACTGCCCC-BHQ1-3' | 182 |
| 5'R2:5'-TTCGGCGTTAATTCAGTACAT-3' | ||||
| 4 | 5'F3/5'R2/5'P | 5'F3:5'-GTGATCTTGTTCGTTGTATTGG-3' | 5'P:5'-FAM-TCCCTGAGAGTCAACTGCCCC-BHQ1-3' | 119 |
| 5'R2:5'-TTCGGCGTTAATTCAGTACAT-3' | ||||
| 5 | 3'F1/3'R2/3'P | 3'F1:5'-TTTTATGATTAGAGTCCCGCA-3' | 3'P:5'-FAM-TTACTAGATCGGG AATTAAACTATCAGTG-BHQ1-3' | 163 |
| 3'R2:5'-TGCAGCTTTTGTTGACCTAA-3' | ||||
| 6 | 3'F2/3'R2/3'P | 3'F2:5'-CGTTATTTATGAGATGGGTTTTT-3' | 3'P:5'-FAM-TTACTAGATCGGG AATTAAACTATCAGTG-BHQ1-3' | 182 |
| 3'R2:5'-TGCAGCTTTTGTTGACCTAA-3' | ||||
| 7 | 3'F3/3'R2/3'P | 3'F3:5'-GCGATAGAAAACAAAATATAGCG-3' | 3'P:5'-FAM-TTACTAGATCGGG AATTAAACTATCAGTG-BHQ1-3' | 126 |
| 3'R2:5'-TGCAGCTTTTGTTGACCTAA-3' | ||||
| 8 | 3'F1/3'R3/3'P | 3'F1:5'-TTTTATGATTAGAGTCCCGCA-3' | 3'P:5'-FAM-TTACTAGATCGGG AATTAAACTATCAGTG-BHQ1-3' | 183 |
| 3'R3:5'-CTAGTATCGCAAAAGGTCGG-3' |
Table 1 The sequence of primers and probes for real-time quantitative PCR
| 编号 | 引物探针组合 | 引物序列(5'→3') | 探针序列(5'→3') | 扩增片段大小/bp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5'F2/5'R1/5'P | 5'F2:5'-CGGCGGTCAACCAAACAA-3' | 5'P:5'-FAM-TCCCTGAGAGTCAACTGCCCC-BHQ1-3' | 165 |
| 5'R1:5'-ACATTAAAAACGTCCGCAAT-3' | ||||
| 2 | 5'F3/5'R1/5'P | 5'F3:5'-GTGATCTTGTTCGTTGTATTGG-3' | 5'P:5'-FAM-TCCCTGAGAGTCAACTGCCCC-BHQ1-3' | 102 |
| 5'R1:5'-ACATTAAAAACGTCCGCAAT-3' | ||||
| 3 | 5'F2/5'R2/5'P | 5'F2:5'-CGGCGGTCAACCAAACAA-3' | 5'P:5'-FAM-TCCCTGAGAGTCAACTGCCCC-BHQ1-3' | 182 |
| 5'R2:5'-TTCGGCGTTAATTCAGTACAT-3' | ||||
| 4 | 5'F3/5'R2/5'P | 5'F3:5'-GTGATCTTGTTCGTTGTATTGG-3' | 5'P:5'-FAM-TCCCTGAGAGTCAACTGCCCC-BHQ1-3' | 119 |
| 5'R2:5'-TTCGGCGTTAATTCAGTACAT-3' | ||||
| 5 | 3'F1/3'R2/3'P | 3'F1:5'-TTTTATGATTAGAGTCCCGCA-3' | 3'P:5'-FAM-TTACTAGATCGGG AATTAAACTATCAGTG-BHQ1-3' | 163 |
| 3'R2:5'-TGCAGCTTTTGTTGACCTAA-3' | ||||
| 6 | 3'F2/3'R2/3'P | 3'F2:5'-CGTTATTTATGAGATGGGTTTTT-3' | 3'P:5'-FAM-TTACTAGATCGGG AATTAAACTATCAGTG-BHQ1-3' | 182 |
| 3'R2:5'-TGCAGCTTTTGTTGACCTAA-3' | ||||
| 7 | 3'F3/3'R2/3'P | 3'F3:5'-GCGATAGAAAACAAAATATAGCG-3' | 3'P:5'-FAM-TTACTAGATCGGG AATTAAACTATCAGTG-BHQ1-3' | 126 |
| 3'R2:5'-TGCAGCTTTTGTTGACCTAA-3' | ||||
| 8 | 3'F1/3'R3/3'P | 3'F1:5'-TTTTATGATTAGAGTCCCGCA-3' | 3'P:5'-FAM-TTACTAGATCGGG AATTAAACTATCAGTG-BHQ1-3' | 183 |
| 3'R3:5'-CTAGTATCGCAAAAGGTCGG-3' |
| 重复 | BBL2-2转化体拷贝数 | zSSIIb基因拷贝数 | 测量值/% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 29.90 | 28 300.00 | 0.106 |
| 2 | 24.50 | 24 900.00 | 0.099 |
| 3 | 31.50 | 28 900.00 | 0.109 |
| 4 | 26.80 | 26 800.00 | 0.100 |
| 5 | 26.70 | 26 600.00 | 0.100 |
| 6 | 27.90 | 27 300.00 | 0.102 |
| 7 | 26.80 | 26 200.00 | 0.102 |
| 8 | 29.00 | 28 100.00 | 0.103 |
| 9 | 25.30 | 25 000.00 | 0.101 |
| 10 | 25.50 | 25 500.00 | 0.100 |
| 11 | 26.50 | 27 000.00 | 0.098 |
| 12 | 26.80 | 27 000.00 | 0.099 |
| 13 | 27.60 | 27 200.00 | 0.102 |
| 14 | 26.80 | 26 800.00 | 0.100 |
| 15 | 27.60 | 27 300.00 | 0.101 |
| 平均测量值(%) | / | / | 0.101 |
| 相对偏倚(%) | / | / | 1.000 |
| 标准差 | / | / | 0.003 |
| 相对标准差(%) | / | / | 2.809 |
Table 2 The test results for LOQ
| 重复 | BBL2-2转化体拷贝数 | zSSIIb基因拷贝数 | 测量值/% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 29.90 | 28 300.00 | 0.106 |
| 2 | 24.50 | 24 900.00 | 0.099 |
| 3 | 31.50 | 28 900.00 | 0.109 |
| 4 | 26.80 | 26 800.00 | 0.100 |
| 5 | 26.70 | 26 600.00 | 0.100 |
| 6 | 27.90 | 27 300.00 | 0.102 |
| 7 | 26.80 | 26 200.00 | 0.102 |
| 8 | 29.00 | 28 100.00 | 0.103 |
| 9 | 25.30 | 25 000.00 | 0.101 |
| 10 | 25.50 | 25 500.00 | 0.100 |
| 11 | 26.50 | 27 000.00 | 0.098 |
| 12 | 26.80 | 27 000.00 | 0.099 |
| 13 | 27.60 | 27 200.00 | 0.102 |
| 14 | 26.80 | 26 800.00 | 0.100 |
| 15 | 27.60 | 27 300.00 | 0.101 |
| 平均测量值(%) | / | / | 0.101 |
| 相对偏倚(%) | / | / | 1.000 |
| 标准差 | / | / | 0.003 |
| 相对标准差(%) | / | / | 2.809 |
| 重复 | BBL2-2转化体 | zSSIIb基因 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 曲线斜率 | 决定系数 | 扩增效率 | 曲线斜率 | 决定系数 | 扩增效率 | |
| 1 | -3.383 | 0.999 | 97.530% | -3.462 | 0.996 | 94.450% |
| 2 | -3.422 | 0.999 | 95.980% | -3.384 | 0.999 | 97.490% |
| 3 | -3.515 | 0.998 | 92.525% | -3.305 | 1.000 | 100.724% |
| 平均值 | -3.440 | 0.999 | 95.345% | -3.384 | 0.998 | 97.555% |
Table 3 Establishment of standard curve
| 重复 | BBL2-2转化体 | zSSIIb基因 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 曲线斜率 | 决定系数 | 扩增效率 | 曲线斜率 | 决定系数 | 扩增效率 | |
| 1 | -3.383 | 0.999 | 97.530% | -3.462 | 0.996 | 94.450% |
| 2 | -3.422 | 0.999 | 95.980% | -3.384 | 0.999 | 97.490% |
| 3 | -3.515 | 0.998 | 92.525% | -3.305 | 1.000 | 100.724% |
| 平均值 | -3.440 | 0.999 | 95.345% | -3.384 | 0.998 | 97.555% |
| 样品含量/% | 各平行子样转基因含量/% | 平均值/% | 相对偏倚/% | 标准差 | 相对标准差/% | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 子样1 | 子样2 | 子样3 | |||||
| 5.0 | 5.03 | 4.85 | 5.00 | 4.96 | -0.80 | 0.10 | 1.94 |
| 3.0 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.02 | 3.01 | 0.33 | 0.01 | 0.38 |
| 1.0 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 1.04 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 3.20 |
| 0.5 | 0.47 | 0.48 | 0.50 | 0.48 | -4.00 | 0.02 | 3.16 |
| 0.1 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Table 4 The test results of accuracy and precision
| 样品含量/% | 各平行子样转基因含量/% | 平均值/% | 相对偏倚/% | 标准差 | 相对标准差/% | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 子样1 | 子样2 | 子样3 | |||||
| 5.0 | 5.03 | 4.85 | 5.00 | 4.96 | -0.80 | 0.10 | 1.94 |
| 3.0 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.02 | 3.01 | 0.33 | 0.01 | 0.38 |
| 1.0 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 1.04 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 3.20 |
| 0.5 | 0.47 | 0.48 | 0.50 | 0.48 | -4.00 | 0.02 | 3.16 |
| 0.1 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 因素 | 样品测试结果/% | 平均测量值/% | 相对偏倚/% | 标准差 | 相对标准差/% | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | |||||
| 不同操作者 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.96 | -4.00 | 0.01 | 1.04 |
| 不同试剂盒 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.97 | -3.00 | 0.01 | 0.60 |
| 不同仪器 | 1.03 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 2.51 |
Table 5 Robustness testing results
| 因素 | 样品测试结果/% | 平均测量值/% | 相对偏倚/% | 标准差 | 相对标准差/% | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | |||||
| 不同操作者 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.96 | -4.00 | 0.01 | 1.04 |
| 不同试剂盒 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.97 | -3.00 | 0.01 | 0.60 |
| 不同仪器 | 1.03 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 2.51 |
| 样品名称 | BBL2-2转化体特异性序列重复测定结果 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 子样1 | 子样2 | 子样3 | |||||||
| 重复1 | 重复2 | 重复3 | 重复1 | 重复2 | 重复3 | 重复1 | 重复2 | 重复3 | |
| 空白对照 | - | / | / | - | / | / | - | / | / |
| 阴性对照 | - | / | / | - | / | / | - | / | / |
| 阳性对照 | + | / | / | + | / | / | + | / | / |
| 1% BBL2-2玉米 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| 其他转基因玉米混合样 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 转基因大豆混合样 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 转基因水稻混合样 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 转基因棉花混合样 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 转基因油菜混合样 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 非转基因玉米混合样 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 0.05% BBL2-2玉米 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
Table 6 Results of inter-laboratory collaborative verification for specificity and LOD
| 样品名称 | BBL2-2转化体特异性序列重复测定结果 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 子样1 | 子样2 | 子样3 | |||||||
| 重复1 | 重复2 | 重复3 | 重复1 | 重复2 | 重复3 | 重复1 | 重复2 | 重复3 | |
| 空白对照 | - | / | / | - | / | / | - | / | / |
| 阴性对照 | - | / | / | - | / | / | - | / | / |
| 阳性对照 | + | / | / | + | / | / | + | / | / |
| 1% BBL2-2玉米 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| 其他转基因玉米混合样 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 转基因大豆混合样 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 转基因水稻混合样 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 转基因棉花混合样 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 转基因油菜混合样 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 非转基因玉米混合样 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 0.05% BBL2-2玉米 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| 实验室 | PCR板序号 | zSSIIb基因 | BBL2-2转化体 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 曲线斜率 | 决定系数 | 扩增效率/% | 曲线斜率 | 决定系数 | 扩增效率/% | ||
| Lab 1 | 1 | -3.220 | 0.999 | 104.400 | -3.363 | 0.997 | 98.300 |
| 2 | -3.151 | 0.999 | 107.700 | -3.330 | 0.998 | 99.700 | |
| 3 | -3.409 | 0.995 | 96.500 | -3.277 | 0.998 | 101.900 | |
| Lab 2 | 1 | -3.287 | 0.998 | 101.474 | -3.367 | 0.991 | 98.161 |
| 2 | -3.370 | 0.998 | 98.032 | -3.169 | 0.996 | 106.784 | |
| 3 | -3.322 | 0.992 | 99.993 | -3.299 | 0.999 | 100.962 | |
| Lab 3 | 1 | -3.498 | 0.999 | 93.100 | -3.486 | 0.99 | 93.600 |
| 2 | -3.465 | 0.997 | 94.400 | -3.434 | 0.998 | 95.500 | |
| 3 | -3.437 | 0.998 | 95.400 | -3.432 | 0.999 | 95.600 | |
| Lab 4 | 1 | -3.171 | 0.998 | 106.727 | -3.253 | 0.998 | 102.981 |
| 2 | -3.113 | 0.995 | 109.509 | -3.188 | 0.996 | 105.895 | |
| 3 | -3.214 | 0.984 | 104.710 | -3.183 | 0.995 | 106.124 | |
| Lab 5 | 1 | -3.367 | 0.998 | 98.149 | -3.341 | 0.997 | 99.202 |
| 2 | -3.285 | 0.998 | 101.560 | -3.292 | 0.998 | 101.256 | |
| 3 | -3.338 | 0.999 | 99.346 | -3.346 | 0.999 | 99.009 | |
| Lab 6 | 1 | -3.139 | 0.999 | 108.200 | -3.195 | 0.999 | 105.600 |
| 2 | -3.194 | 0.999 | 105.600 | -3.171 | 0.999 | 106.700 | |
| 3 | -3.147 | 0.999 | 107.800 | -3.195 | 0.999 | 105.600 | |
| Lab 7 | 1 | -3.308 | 0.995 | 100.600 | -3.395 | 0.997 | 97.000 |
| 2 | -3.345 | 0.996 | 99.100 | -3.464 | 0.992 | 94.400 | |
| 3 | -3.394 | 0.996 | 97.100 | -3.253 | 0.993 | 103.000 | |
| Lab 8 | 1 | -3.459 | 0.998 | 94.577 | -3.450 | 0.998 | 94.908 |
| 2 | -3.375 | 0.998 | 97.844 | -3.422 | 0.999 | 95.983 | |
| 3 | -3.258 | 0.997 | 102.726 | -3.492 | 0.997 | 93.372 | |
Table 7 Results of inter-laboratory validation standard curve testing
| 实验室 | PCR板序号 | zSSIIb基因 | BBL2-2转化体 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 曲线斜率 | 决定系数 | 扩增效率/% | 曲线斜率 | 决定系数 | 扩增效率/% | ||
| Lab 1 | 1 | -3.220 | 0.999 | 104.400 | -3.363 | 0.997 | 98.300 |
| 2 | -3.151 | 0.999 | 107.700 | -3.330 | 0.998 | 99.700 | |
| 3 | -3.409 | 0.995 | 96.500 | -3.277 | 0.998 | 101.900 | |
| Lab 2 | 1 | -3.287 | 0.998 | 101.474 | -3.367 | 0.991 | 98.161 |
| 2 | -3.370 | 0.998 | 98.032 | -3.169 | 0.996 | 106.784 | |
| 3 | -3.322 | 0.992 | 99.993 | -3.299 | 0.999 | 100.962 | |
| Lab 3 | 1 | -3.498 | 0.999 | 93.100 | -3.486 | 0.99 | 93.600 |
| 2 | -3.465 | 0.997 | 94.400 | -3.434 | 0.998 | 95.500 | |
| 3 | -3.437 | 0.998 | 95.400 | -3.432 | 0.999 | 95.600 | |
| Lab 4 | 1 | -3.171 | 0.998 | 106.727 | -3.253 | 0.998 | 102.981 |
| 2 | -3.113 | 0.995 | 109.509 | -3.188 | 0.996 | 105.895 | |
| 3 | -3.214 | 0.984 | 104.710 | -3.183 | 0.995 | 106.124 | |
| Lab 5 | 1 | -3.367 | 0.998 | 98.149 | -3.341 | 0.997 | 99.202 |
| 2 | -3.285 | 0.998 | 101.560 | -3.292 | 0.998 | 101.256 | |
| 3 | -3.338 | 0.999 | 99.346 | -3.346 | 0.999 | 99.009 | |
| Lab 6 | 1 | -3.139 | 0.999 | 108.200 | -3.195 | 0.999 | 105.600 |
| 2 | -3.194 | 0.999 | 105.600 | -3.171 | 0.999 | 106.700 | |
| 3 | -3.147 | 0.999 | 107.800 | -3.195 | 0.999 | 105.600 | |
| Lab 7 | 1 | -3.308 | 0.995 | 100.600 | -3.395 | 0.997 | 97.000 |
| 2 | -3.345 | 0.996 | 99.100 | -3.464 | 0.992 | 94.400 | |
| 3 | -3.394 | 0.996 | 97.100 | -3.253 | 0.993 | 103.000 | |
| Lab 8 | 1 | -3.459 | 0.998 | 94.577 | -3.450 | 0.998 | 94.908 |
| 2 | -3.375 | 0.998 | 97.844 | -3.422 | 0.999 | 95.983 | |
| 3 | -3.258 | 0.997 | 102.726 | -3.492 | 0.997 | 93.372 | |
| 转基因标称值/% | 5.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 检测总平均值 | 4.935 | 2.803 | 0.905 | 0.463 | 0.099 |
| 重复性标准差 | 0.163 2 | 0.101 9 | 0.049 7 | 0.021 1 | 0.007 9 |
| 重复性相对标准差/% | 3.308 | 3.633 | 5.497 | 4.550 | 7.960 |
| 再现性标准差 | 0.330 4 | 0.203 4 | 0.088 1 | 0.049 0 | 0.009 4 |
| 再现性相对标准差/% | 6.695 | 7.254 | 9.742 | 10.583 | 9.493 |
Table 8 Repeatability and reproducibility analysis of samples
| 转基因标称值/% | 5.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 检测总平均值 | 4.935 | 2.803 | 0.905 | 0.463 | 0.099 |
| 重复性标准差 | 0.163 2 | 0.101 9 | 0.049 7 | 0.021 1 | 0.007 9 |
| 重复性相对标准差/% | 3.308 | 3.633 | 5.497 | 4.550 | 7.960 |
| 再现性标准差 | 0.330 4 | 0.203 4 | 0.088 1 | 0.049 0 | 0.009 4 |
| 再现性相对标准差/% | 6.695 | 7.254 | 9.742 | 10.583 | 9.493 |
| [1] | AGBIOINVESTOR. AgbioInvestor GM monitor, 2024: Global GM Crop Area Review[EB/OL]. [2026-02-08].. |
| [2] | GRUÈRE G P, CARTER C A, FARZIN Y H. Explaining international differences in genetically modified food labeling policies[J]. Rev. Int. Econ., 2009, 17(3): 393-408. |
| [3] | 徐琳杰,刘培磊,熊鹂,等.国际上主要国家和地区农业转基因产品的标识制度[J].生物安全学报,2014,23(4):301-304. |
| XU L J, LIU P L, XIONG L, et al.. International labeling policies for genetically modified agricultural products[J]. J. Biosaf., 2014, 23(4): 301-304. | |
| [4] | 付仲文,杨景华,寇建平.推进我国转基因技术研究与产业化法律法规修改的几点思考[J].生物技术进展,2012,2(1):5-10. |
| FU Z W, YANG J H, KOU J P. Considerations about modification of laws and rules on boosting transgenic research and industrialization in China[J]. Curr. Biotechnol., 2012, 2(1): 5-10. | |
| [5] | 焦悦,朱鹏宇,梁晋刚,等.国际转基因食品安全评价政策及启示[J].生物技术进展,2021,11(2):121-127. |
| JIAO Y, ZHU P Y, LIANG J G, et al.. International genetically modified food safety evaluation policy and its enlightenment[J]. Curr. Biotechnol., 2021, 11(2): 121-127. | |
| [6] | 黄耀辉,樊殿峰,焦悦,等.浅谈多国转基因产品标识制度对我国的启示[J].生物技术进展,2022,12(4):516-522. |
| HUANG Y H, FAN D F, JIAO Y, et al.. Enlightenment of GMO labeling system in other countries to China[J]. Curr. Biotechnol., 2022, 12(4): 516-522. | |
| [7] | BRUETSCHY C. The EU regulatory framework on genetically modified organisms (GMOs)[J]. Transgenic Res., 2019, 28(2): 169-174. |
| [8] | NOGUCHI A, NAKAMURA K, SAKATA K, et al.. Development and interlaboratory validation of a simple screening method for genetically modified maize using a ΔΔCq-based multiplex real-time PCR assay[J]. Anal. Chem., 2016, 88(8): 4285-4293. |
| [9] | YAO X, LI J, WAN D, et al.. Development of an event-specific PCR method to quantify genetically modified soybean DBN8002 on both real-time and digital PCR platforms[J/OL]. J. Food Compos. Anal., 2024, 135: 106657[2026-02-08]. . |
| [10] | US Department of Agriculture. National bioengineered food discloseure standard[EB/OL].[2026-02-08]. . |
| [11] | YAO X, LI J, WAN D, et al.. A rapid and cost-effective approach for quantifying the content of genetically modified organism to facilitate the enforcement of labeling regulation[J/OL]. Microchem. J., 2025, 214: 114066[2026-02-08]. . |
| [12] | ZHAO Y, DENG H, YU C, et al.. The Chinese public's awareness and attitudes toward genetically modified foods with different labeling[J/OL]. NPJ Sci. Food, 2019, 3: 17[2026-02-08]. . |
| [13] | LONG L, YAN W, LI C, et al.. Event-specific quantitative polymerase chain reaction methods for detection of double-herbicide-resistant genetically modified corn MON87419 based on the 3'-junction of the insertion site[J]. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem., 2021, 85(6): 1468-1475. |
| [14] | 罗建兴,刘国强,呼李乐,等.转基因作物检测技术研究进展[J].食品安全质量检测学报,2023,14(15):139-148. |
| LUO J X, LIU G Q, HU L L, et al.. Research progress on detection technology of genetically modified crops[J]. J. Food Saf. Qual., 2023, 14(15): 139-148. | |
| [15] | 温洪涛,杨洋,丁一佳,等.抗虫玉米CM8101定性检测方法的建立[J].生物技术进展,2022,12(2):248-255. |
| WEN H T, YANG Y, DING Y J, et al.. Establishment of qualitative PCR detection of transgenic insect-resistant maize CM8101[J]. Curr. Biotechnol., 2022, 12(2): 248-255. | |
| [16] | 张月秋,傅芳奇,张华,等.转基因耐除草剂大豆LP012-1转化体实时荧光定量PCR检测方法的研究[J].生物技术进展,2025,15(2):276-286. |
| ZHANG Y Q, FU F Q, ZHANG H, et al.. Research of detection method for genetically modified herbicide-tolerant soyabean LP012-1 transformant by quantitative real-time PCR[J]. Curr. Biotechnol., 2025, 15(2): 276-286. | |
| [17] | 张月秋,傅芳奇,赵桐桐,等.转基因耐除草剂大豆LP012-1转化体普通PCR定性检测方法的研究[J].生物技术进展,2025,15(3):466-475. |
| ZHANG Y Q, FU F Q, ZHAO T T, et al.. Development of PCR qualitative method for genetically modified herbicide-tolerant soyabean LP012-1[J]. Curr. Biotechnol., 2025, 15(3): 466-475. | |
| [18] | 田锦,高芳瑞,李玲,等.转基因玉米Bt11特异性定性PCR检测方法的建立[J].生物技术进展,2025,15(6):1031-1039. |
| TIAN J, GAO F R, LI L, et al.. Establishment of specific qualitative PCR detection method of transgenic maize Bt11[J]. Curr. Biotechnol., 2025, 15(6): 1031-1039. | |
| [19] | 中华人民共和国农业部. 转基因植物及其产品成分检测定性PCR方法制定指南: 农业部2259号公告—4—2015 [S].北京:中国农业出版社,2015. |
| [20] | 中华人民共和国农业部. 转基因植物及其产品成分检测 玉米内标准基因定性PCR方法: 农业部1861号公告—3—2012 [S].北京:中国农业出版社,2013. |
| [21] | SCHNABLE P S, WARE D, FULTON R S, et al.. The B73 maize genome: complexity, diversity, and dynamics[J].Science, 2009, 326(5956): 1112-1115. |
| [22] | 中华人民共和国农业部. 转基因植物及其产品成分检测实时荧光定量PCR方法制定指南:农业部2259号公告—5—2015 [S].北京:中国农业出版社,2015. |
| [23] | 章寅,贾军伟,白蓝,等.转基因检测标准的方法验证工作研究[J].生物技术进展,2024,14(1):120-124. |
| ZHANG Y, JIA J W, BAI L, et al.. Analysis of method validation of transgenic testing standards[J]. Curr. Biotechnol., 2024, 14(1): 120-124. | |
| [24] | 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会. 测量方法与结果的准确度(正确度与精密度)第2部分:确定标准测量方法重复性与再现性的基本方法: [S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2004. |
| [25] | 李允静,任雪贞,肖芳,等.基于二重实时荧光PCR方法精准快速鉴定大豆转基因种子转化体纯度[J].中国农业科学,2024,57(23):4698-4711. |
| LI Y J, REN X Z, XIAO F, et al.. Accurate and rapid identification of event purity for transgenic soybean seeds based on duplex real-time fluorescence PCR method[J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2024, 57(23): 4698-4711. | |
| [26] | HOLST-JENSEN A, BERTHEAU Y, DE LOOSE M, et al.. Detecting un-authorized genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and derived materials[J]. Biotechnol. Adv., 2012, 30(6): 1318-1335. |
| [27] | 咸若彤,缪青梅,彭城,等.转基因玉米WYN17132转化体特异性实时荧光PCR检测方法的建立与应用[J].浙江农业学报,2025,37(7):1397-1406. |
| XIAN R T, MIAO Q M, PENG C, et al.. Establishment and application of event-specific real-time PCR detection method of transgenic maize WYN17132[J]. Acta Agric. Zhejiangensis, 2025, 37(7): 1397-1406. | |
| [28] | 国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 转基因检测实验室测量不确定度评估指南: [S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2017. |
| [29] | International Organization for Standardization (ISO), International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). Uncertainty of measurement—Part 3: Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement: Guide 98-3:2008[S/OL]. . |
| [30] | 李俊,赵新,陈红,等.转基因定量检测结果测量不确定度的自上而下评定方法研究及应用[J].中国农业科学,2023,56(22):4371-4385. |
| LI J, ZHAO X, CHEN H, et al.. Development and application of top-down approaches for estimating measurement uncertainty of GMO quantitative results[J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2023, 56(22): 4371-4385. |
| [1] | Yanyan JIA, Luyang DUANMU. Study on the Mechanism of Bubble Generation and Inhibition Method During Digital PCR Amplification Process [J]. Current Biotechnology, 2025, 15(4): 693-701. |
| [2] | Weiping ZHAO, Yihui QI, Jingjing LI, Shuang SONG, Rui ZHAI, Qianqian DU. Quantitative Determination of Fucoidan by Improved 1,9-dimethyl-methylene Blue Method [J]. Current Biotechnology, 2023, 13(5): 779-784. |
| [3] | MIAO Qingmei1, ZHAO Yang2, XU Xiaoli1, XU Junfeng1, WANG Xiaofu1, CHEN Xiaoyun1*. Establishment of Transformant-specific Detection Method for the Herbicide-tolerant Transgenic Soybean Event ZUTS-33 Harboring the g10-epsps Transgene [J]. Curr. Biotech., 2020, 10(6): 696-703. |
| [4] | ZHENG Zifan, LIU Weixiao, JIN Wujun, LI Liang*. Progress on Reference Materials Based on Mass Balance Method [J]. Curr. Biotech., 2020, 10(6): 623-629. |
| [5] | ZHENG Zifan, LIU Fangfang, LIU Weixiao, JIN Wujun, LI Liang*. Application of Digital PCR Technology in the Development of Nucleic Acid Reference Materials [J]. Curr. Biotech., 2020, 10(6): 579-584. |
| [6] | WU Wenyan§, LIU Xinxiang§, ZHOU Miaoyi*, LIU Jinxiang, LIU Ya. Establishment of Event-specific PCR Detection Method of Transgenic Maize Line 2A-5 [J]. Curr. Biotech., 2020, 10(4): 363-370. |
| [7] | LIU Xiao1, ZHU Pengyu2, JING Xiaoyan2, LI Zhihong1, ZHANG Yongjiang2, LI Xiang3, FU Wei1,2*. Application of Duplex Droplet Digital PCR for Detection of Genetically Modified Soybean [J]. Curr. Biotech., 2020, 10(1): 60-66. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||