Current Biotechnology ›› 2026, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (1): 86-93.DOI: 10.19586/j.2095-2341.2025.0140
• Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
Dong ZHANG1(
), Xiaoyan ZHANG1, Jiale LI1, Yuanxin ZHANG1, Fenglan ZHANG1, Zhongren YANG1, Jianwen LIU2, Hua XU2(
)
Received:2025-10-17
Accepted:2025-12-16
Online:2026-01-25
Published:2026-02-12
Contact:
Hua XU
CLC Number:
Dong ZHANG, Xiaoyan ZHANG, Jiale LI, Yuanxin ZHANG, Fenglan ZHANG, Zhongren YANG, Jianwen LIU, Hua XU. Effects of Drought Stress on Physiological Characteristics of Licorice Seedlings[J]. Current Biotechnology, 2026, 16(1): 86-93.
张东, 张晓艳, 李佳乐, 张愿欣, 张凤兰, 杨忠仁, 刘建文, 旭花. 干旱胁迫对乌拉尔甘草苗生理特性的影响[J]. 生物技术进展, 2026, 16(1): 86-93.
| 处理 | 叶 | 根 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 总值 | 平均值 | 总值 | 平均值 | ||
| CK | 8.00 | 0.57 | 8.00 | 0.57 | |
| LS | 12.80 | 0.91 | 10.75 | 0.77 | |
| MS | 10.76 | 0.77 | 10.64 | 0.76 | |
| SS | 7.57 | 0.54 | 7.28 | 0.52 | |
Table 1 Comprehensive drought resistance coefficients on all indicators of licorice
| 处理 | 叶 | 根 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 总值 | 平均值 | 总值 | 平均值 | ||
| CK | 8.00 | 0.57 | 8.00 | 0.57 | |
| LS | 12.80 | 0.91 | 10.75 | 0.77 | |
| MS | 10.76 | 0.77 | 10.64 | 0.76 | |
| SS | 7.57 | 0.54 | 7.28 | 0.52 | |
| [1] | 杨京京,宁克伟,王明娟,等.陆地棉萌发期抗旱性评价方法及石河子垦区优质种质资源筛选[J].生物技术进展,2025,15(3):486-494. |
| YANG J J, NING K W, WANG M J, et al.. The evaluation method for drought resistance during the germination period of upland cotton and screening of high-quality germplasm resources in the Shihezi reclamation area[J]. Curr. Biotechnol., 2025, 15(3): 486-494. | |
| [2] | OBATA T, FERNIE A R. The use of metabolomics to dissect plant responses to abiotic stresses[J]. Cell. Mol. Life Sci., 2012, 69(19): 3225-3243. |
| [3] | 郝培彤,李玉龙,宁亚明,等.不同干旱处理对科尔沁沙地不同苜蓿品种生产性能的影响[J].草地学报,2018(6):1368-1373. |
| HAO P T, LI Y L, NING Y M, et al.. Effects of different drought treatments on productive performance of different alfalfa varieties in Horqin Sandy Land[J]. Acta Agrestia Sin., 2018(6): 1368-1373. | |
| [4] | FAIZE M, BURGOS L, FAIZE L, et al.. Involvement of cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase and Cu/Zn-superoxide dismutase for improved tolerance against drought stress[J]. J. Exp. Bot., 2011, 62: 2599-2613. |
| [5] | BARTOLI C G, GÓMEZ F, MARTÍNEZ D E, et al.. Mitochondria are the main target for oxidative damage in leaves of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)[J]. J. Exp. Bot., 2004, 55(403): 1663-1669. |
| [6] | FAROOQ A, BUKHARI S A, AKRAM N A, et al.. Exogenously applied ascorbic acid-mediated changes in osmoprotection and oxidative defense system enhanced water stress tolerance in different cultivars of safflower (Carthamus tinctorious L.)[J/OL]. Plants, 2020, 9(1): 104[2025-10-21]. . |
| [7] | LIU H, SULTAN M A R F, LIU X L, et al.. Physiological and comparative proteomic analysis reveals different drought responses in roots and leaves of drought-tolerant wild wheat (Triticum boeoticum)[J/OL]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(4): e0121852[2025-10-02]. . |
| [8] | HUANG X S, WANG W, ZHANG Q, et al.. A basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor, PtrbHLH, of Poncirus trifoliata confers cold tolerance and modulates peroxidase-mediated scavenging of hydrogen peroxide[J]. Plant Physiol., 2013, 162(2): 1178-1194. |
| [9] | XU Y, LU J H, ZHANG J D, et al.. Transcriptome revealed the molecular mechanism of Glycyrrhiza in flata root to maintain growth and development, absorb and distribute ions under salt stress[J/OL]. BMC Plant Biol., 2021, 21(1): 599[2025-10-21]. . |
| [10] | XIE W, HAO Z, ZHOU X, et al.. Arbuscular mycorrhiza facilitates the accumulation of glycyrrhizin and liquiritin in Glycyrrhiza uralensis under drought stress[J]. Mycorrhiza, 2018, 28(3): 285-300. |
| [11] | LU J, LIANG W, LI J, et al.. Integrated morphology analysis, metabolomic analysis and gene expression to assess the quality of four adventitious roots lines of Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch[J]. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult., 2018, 135(1): 169-177. |
| [12] | 张东,刘艳,张晗,等.甘草叶片形态结构和光合作用对干旱胁迫的响应[J].植物研究,2021,41(3):449-457. |
| ZHANG D, LIU Y, ZHANG H, et al.. Response of photosynthesis and leaf morphological characteristics to drought stress in Glycyrrhiza uralensis [J]. Bull. Bot. Res., 2021, 41(3): 449-457. | |
| [13] | 陈娇,谢小玉,张小短,等.甘蓝型油菜苗期抗旱性鉴定及综合抗旱指标筛选[J].中国油料作物学报,2019,41(5):713-722. |
| CHEN J, XIE X Y, ZHANG X D, et al.. Seedling drought resistance and parameter screening of rapeseed[J]. Chin. J. Oil Crop Sci., 2019, 41(5): 713-722. | |
| [14] | RAMACHANDRA REDDY A, CHAITANYA K V, VIVEKANANDAN M. Drought-induced responses of photosynthesis and antioxidant metabolism in higher plants[J]. J. Plant Physiol., 2004, 161(11): 1189-1202. |
| [15] | GOLSHAN M, HABIBI D, BELADI S M, et al.. Copper and lead tolerance strategies in mustard (Sinapis arvensis) Egyptian clover (Trifolium alexandrinum) and hairy vetch (Vicia villosa): role of some antioxidant enzymes[J]. American-Eurasian J. Agri. Environ. Sci., 2011, 11: 122-128. |
| [16] | XING X H, FANG C W, LI L, et al.. Improved drought tolerance by α-naphthaleneacetic acid-induced ROS accumulation in two soybean cultivars[J]. J. Integr. Agric., 2016, 15(8): 1770-1784. |
| [17] | LIU J, LI J, SU X, et al.. Grafting improves drought tolerance by regulating antioxidant enzyme activities and stress-responsive gene expression in tobacco[J]. Environ. Exp. Bot., 2014, 107: 173-179. |
| [18] | 沈少炎,吴玉香,郑郁善.植物干旱胁迫响应机制研究进展:从表型到分子[J].生物技术进展,2017,7(3):169-176. |
| SHEN S Y, WU Y X, ZHENG Y S. Review on drought response in plants from phenotype to molecular[J]. Curr. Biotechnol., 2017, 7(3): 169-176. | |
| [19] | 卫星,王政权,张国珍,等.水曲柳苗木不同根序对干旱胁迫的生理生化反应[J].林业科学,2009,45(6):16-21. |
| WEI X, WANG Z Q, ZHANG G Z, et al.. Physiological and biochemical responses of different order roots in Fraxinus mandshurica seedlings to drought stress[J]. Sci. Silvae Sin., 2009, 45(6): 16-21. | |
| [20] | 刘济明,赵晓鹏,廖小峰,等.罗甸小米核桃抗氧化保护酶活性和丙二醛含量对干旱胁迫的响应[J].河南农业科学,2012,41(9):122-126. |
| LIU J M, ZHAO X P, LIAO X F, et al.. Study on protective enzyme system and MDA content of Juglans regia f. luodianense Liu et Xu under dry stress[J]. J. Henan Agric. Sci., 2012, 41(9): 122-126. | |
| [21] | SHARMA P, JHA A B, DUBEY R S, et al.. Reactive oxygen species, oxidative damage, and antioxidative defense mechanism in plants under stressful conditions[J/OL]. J. Bot., 2012, 2012: 217037[2025-10-21]. . |
| [22] | 张怡,路铁刚.植物中的活性氧研究概述[J].生物技术进展,2011,1(4):242-248. |
| ZHANG Y, LU T G. The research of reactive oxygen species(ROS) in plants[J]. Curr. Biotechnol., 2011, 1(4): 242-248. |
| [1] | Zhou PAN, Ke HU. The Role of Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Hypoxic Pulmonary Hypertension [J]. Current Biotechnology, 2023, 13(6): 882-888. |
| [2] | Shiming LI, Peng ZHANG, Pengxiang ZHAO, Fei XIE, Xiaoping CHEN, Mengyu LIU. Research Progress of Oxidative Stress and Disuse Muscular Atrophy [J]. Current Biotechnology, 2023, 13(4): 524-533. |
| [3] | Dilin DAI, Yuan WU, Mingwei BAO. The Effects of Reactive Oxygen Species Mediated by Monoamine Oxidase A in Cardiovascular Diseases [J]. Current Biotechnology, 2023, 13(4): 542-546. |
| [4] | Run DU, Siqi ZHANG, Haiwen ZHANG, Tao CHEN. The Tolerance Mechanism of Sunflower Under Abiotic Stress [J]. Current Biotechnology, 2022, 12(2): 205-212. |
| [5] | SHEN Shaoyan1, WU Yuxiang1, ZHENG Yushan1,2*. Review on Drought Response in Plants from Phenotype to Molecular [J]. Curr. Biotech., 2017, 7(3): 169-176. |
| [6] | ZHANG Liang1,2, ZHANG Lan2,WANG Xiao-ping1*. Functional Analysis of GmTMT2a Transgenic Maize Under Drought Stress [J]. Curr. Biotech., 2015, 5(2): 127-131. |
| [7] | GUO Fang-fang, YANG Wei, JIANG Wei*. The Formation Mechanism and Role of Bacterial Magnetosomes and its Applications [J]. journal1, 2012, 2(1): 16-22. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||