Current Biotechnology ›› 2024, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (3): 413-421.DOI: 10.19586/j.2095-2341.2023.0167
• Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
Qiyu ZHANG(
), Xiaogui LYU, Jin BAO(
)
Received:2023-12-20
Accepted:2024-03-25
Online:2024-05-25
Published:2024-06-18
Contact:
Jin BAO
通讯作者:
包锦
作者简介:张奇雨 E-mail: 2962888599@qq.com;
基金资助:CLC Number:
Qiyu ZHANG, Xiaogui LYU, Jin BAO. Effect of Cold Plasma Treatment on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Oats Under Salt Stress[J]. Current Biotechnology, 2024, 14(3): 413-421.
张奇雨, 吕晓桂, 包锦. 冷等离子体处理对盐胁迫下燕麦种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 生物技术进展, 2024, 14(3): 413-421.
| 组别 | CK1 CK2 CK3 | A1 A2 A3 | B1 B2 B3 | C1 C2 C3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 电压/kV | - | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| 处理时间/s | - | 30 30 30 | 15 15 15 | 30 30 30 |
| 处理次数 | - | 1 1 1 | 2 2 2 | 1 1 1 |
| 溶液浓度 /(g·L-1) | 0.5 1.0 1.5 | 0.5 1.0 1.5 | 0.5 1.0 1.5 | 0.5 1.0 1.5 |
Table 1 Treatment parameters for each group of oat seeds
| 组别 | CK1 CK2 CK3 | A1 A2 A3 | B1 B2 B3 | C1 C2 C3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 电压/kV | - | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| 处理时间/s | - | 30 30 30 | 15 15 15 | 30 30 30 |
| 处理次数 | - | 1 1 1 | 2 2 2 | 1 1 1 |
| 溶液浓度 /(g·L-1) | 0.5 1.0 1.5 | 0.5 1.0 1.5 | 0.5 1.0 1.5 | 0.5 1.0 1.5 |
| 指标 | 表面接触角 | 吸水率 | 发芽势 | 发芽率 | 株高 | 根长 | 叶绿素 | 丙二醛 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 表面接触角 | 1.000 | |||||||
| 吸水率 | -0.877** | 1.000 | ||||||
| 发芽势 | 0.411 | -0.296 | 1.000 | |||||
| 发芽率 | 0.626* | -0.532* | 0.922** | 1.000 | ||||
| 株高 | 0.139 | 0.066 | 0.909** | 0.741** | 1.000 | |||
| 根长 | 0.006 | 0.183 | 0.761** | 0.597* | 0.915** | 1.000 | ||
| 叶绿素 | 0.410 | -0.404 | 0.577* | 0.590* | 0.580* | 0.597* | 1.000 | |
| 丙二醛 | -0.479 | 0.299 | -0.318 | -0.471 | -0.327 | -0.360 | -0.503* | 1.000 |
Table 2 Correlation analysis of various indicators
| 指标 | 表面接触角 | 吸水率 | 发芽势 | 发芽率 | 株高 | 根长 | 叶绿素 | 丙二醛 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 表面接触角 | 1.000 | |||||||
| 吸水率 | -0.877** | 1.000 | ||||||
| 发芽势 | 0.411 | -0.296 | 1.000 | |||||
| 发芽率 | 0.626* | -0.532* | 0.922** | 1.000 | ||||
| 株高 | 0.139 | 0.066 | 0.909** | 0.741** | 1.000 | |||
| 根长 | 0.006 | 0.183 | 0.761** | 0.597* | 0.915** | 1.000 | ||
| 叶绿素 | 0.410 | -0.404 | 0.577* | 0.590* | 0.580* | 0.597* | 1.000 | |
| 丙二醛 | -0.479 | 0.299 | -0.318 | -0.471 | -0.327 | -0.360 | -0.503* | 1.000 |
| 组别 | 综合指标X1 | 综合指标X2 | 综合指标X3 | 隶属函数值μ1 | 隶属函数值μ2 | 隶属函数值μ3 | 综合评价F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK1 | 1.791 2 | -0.539 7 | 1.313 6 | 1.000 0 | 0.377 6 | 0.931 1 | 0.820 2 |
| CK2 | 1.160 5 | -1.061 0 | -0.502 5 | 0.820 2 | 0.237 4 | 0.326 5 | 0.605 9 |
| CK3 | -0.146 7 | -1.944 2 | 0.082 0 | 0.447 6 | 0.000 0 | 0.521 1 | 0.331 4 |
| A1 | 0.174 7 | 0.665 8 | 1.520 4 | 0.539 2 | 0.701 6 | 1.000 0 | 0.633 5 |
| A2 | 0.370 6 | 0.427 0 | -1.483 0 | 0.595 1 | 0.637 4 | 0.000 0 | 0.543 1 |
| A3 | -0.222 0 | -0.250 2 | -1.434 1 | 0.426 1 | 0.455 4 | 0.016 3 | 0.390 4 |
| B1 | 0.729 1 | 1.775 6 | 0.323 9 | 0.697 2 | 1.000 0 | 0.601 6 | 0.770 9 |
| B2 | -0.655 9 | 0.787 3 | -0.147 4 | 0.302 4 | 0.734 3 | 0.444 7 | 0.437 3 |
| B3 | -1.190 8 | 0.708 4 | -0.066 9 | 0.150 0 | 0.713 1 | 0.471 5 | 0.340 4 |
| C1 | 0.499 5 | 0.507 1 | -0.491 9 | 0.631 8 | 0.659 0 | 0.330 0 | 0.607 0 |
| C2 | -0.793 4 | -0.490 0 | -0.474 3 | 0.263 2 | 0.390 9 | 0.335 9 | 0.306 4 |
| C3 | -1.716 8 | -0.586 0 | 1.360 1 | 0.000 0 | 0.365 1 | 0.946 6 | 0.202 5 |
Table 3 Comprehensive evaluation results of salt resistance of oats under cold plasma treatment
| 组别 | 综合指标X1 | 综合指标X2 | 综合指标X3 | 隶属函数值μ1 | 隶属函数值μ2 | 隶属函数值μ3 | 综合评价F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK1 | 1.791 2 | -0.539 7 | 1.313 6 | 1.000 0 | 0.377 6 | 0.931 1 | 0.820 2 |
| CK2 | 1.160 5 | -1.061 0 | -0.502 5 | 0.820 2 | 0.237 4 | 0.326 5 | 0.605 9 |
| CK3 | -0.146 7 | -1.944 2 | 0.082 0 | 0.447 6 | 0.000 0 | 0.521 1 | 0.331 4 |
| A1 | 0.174 7 | 0.665 8 | 1.520 4 | 0.539 2 | 0.701 6 | 1.000 0 | 0.633 5 |
| A2 | 0.370 6 | 0.427 0 | -1.483 0 | 0.595 1 | 0.637 4 | 0.000 0 | 0.543 1 |
| A3 | -0.222 0 | -0.250 2 | -1.434 1 | 0.426 1 | 0.455 4 | 0.016 3 | 0.390 4 |
| B1 | 0.729 1 | 1.775 6 | 0.323 9 | 0.697 2 | 1.000 0 | 0.601 6 | 0.770 9 |
| B2 | -0.655 9 | 0.787 3 | -0.147 4 | 0.302 4 | 0.734 3 | 0.444 7 | 0.437 3 |
| B3 | -1.190 8 | 0.708 4 | -0.066 9 | 0.150 0 | 0.713 1 | 0.471 5 | 0.340 4 |
| C1 | 0.499 5 | 0.507 1 | -0.491 9 | 0.631 8 | 0.659 0 | 0.330 0 | 0.607 0 |
| C2 | -0.793 4 | -0.490 0 | -0.474 3 | 0.263 2 | 0.390 9 | 0.335 9 | 0.306 4 |
| C3 | -1.716 8 | -0.586 0 | 1.360 1 | 0.000 0 | 0.365 1 | 0.946 6 | 0.202 5 |
| 1 | 都润,张思琦,张海文,等.逆境胁迫下向日葵的耐受机制[J].生物技术进展,2022,12(2):205-212. |
| DU R, ZHANG S Q, ZHANG H W, et al.. The tolerance mechanism of sunflower under abiotic stress[J]. Curr. Biotechnol., 2022, 12(2): 205-212. | |
| 2 | 祁旭升,王兴荣,许军,等.胡麻种质资源成株期抗旱性评价[J].中国农业科学,2010,43(15):3076-3087. |
| QI X S, WANG X R, XU J, et al.. Drought-resistance evaluation of flax germplasm at adult plant stage[J]. Sci. Agric. Sin., 2010, 43(15): 3076-3087. | |
| 3 | 赵东晓,杜建勋,陈传杰,等.桑树盐碱胁迫研究进展[J].山东农业科学,2015,47(5):132-135. |
| ZHAO D X, DU J X, CHEN C J, et al.. Research progress on saline alkali stress of mulberry[J]. Shandong Agric. Sci., 2015, 47(5): 132-135. | |
| 4 | 宋璟,岑慧芳,刘华玥,等.冷等离子体对作物种子处理效应的研究进展[J].作物杂志,2021(6):9-14. |
| SONG J, CEN H F, LIU H Y, et al.. Advances in cold plasma treatment effects on crop seeds[J]. Crops, 2021(6): 9-14. | |
| 5 | LI L, JIANG J, LI J, et al.. Effects of cold plasma treatment on seed germination and seedling growth of soybean[J/OL]. Sci. Rep., 2014, 4: 5859[2024-04-07]. . |
| 6 | JIANG J, HE X, LI L, et al.. Effect of cold plasma treatment on seed germination and growth of wheat[J]. Plasma Sci. Technol., 2014, 16(1): 54-58. |
| 7 | 周筑文,黄燕芬,杨思泽,等.大气压等离子体处理对番茄生长发育及产量与品质的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2010,38(2):1085-1088. |
| ZHOU Z W, HUANG Y F, YANG S Z, et al.. Effects of atmospheric pressure plasma on the growth, yield and quality of tomato[J]. J. Anhui Agric. Sci., 2010, 38(2): 1085-1088. | |
| 8 | 李怀智,庞金安.物理方法处理种子对黄瓜生长发育的影响研究进展[J].农业与技术,2003,23(2):47-49+57. |
| LI H Z, PANG J A. Progress of study on seed treatment of physical techniques in cucumber[J]. Agric. Technol., 2003, 23(2): 47-49+57. | |
| 9 | 骆美洁,赵衍鑫,宋伟,等.常压室温等离子体对玉米种子及花粉萌发的影响[J].分子植物育种,2016,14(5):1262-1267. |
| LUO M J, ZHAO Y X, SONG W, et al.. Effects on maize seed and pollen germination by atmospheric and room temperature plasma[J]. Mol. Plant Breed., 2016, 14(5): 1262-1267. | |
| 10 | 童家赟.空气等离子体预处理提高穿心莲种子活力的研究[D].广州:广州中医药大学,2012. |
| 11 | 邓敏,赵玲,滕应,等.冷等离子体种子处理对铜胁迫下小麦种子萌发与幼苗生长的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2018,37(12):2669-2677. |
| DENG M, ZHAO L, TENG Y, et al.. The effects of cold plasma treatment on wheat seed germination and seedling growth under copper stress[J]. J. Agro-Environ. Sci., 2018, 37(12): 2669-2677. | |
| 12 | SHETEIWY A S M.引发和冷等离子体处理通过生理、分子及代谢调控提高水稻种子的抗逆性[D].杭州:浙江大学,2017. |
| 13 | ROY N C, HASAN M M, KABIR A H, et al.. Atmospheric pressure gliding arc discharge plasma treatments for improving germination, growth and yield of wheat[J/OL]. Plasma Sci. Technol., 2018, 20(11): 115501[2024-04-07]. . |
| 14 | 蔡庆生.植物生理学实验[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社,2013. |
| 15 | 陈建勋,王晓峰.植物生理学实验指导[M].广州:华南理工大学出版社,2015. |
| 16 | 任棚,吕晓桂,石磊.大气压冷等离子体持续和间隔处理对燕麦种子萌发的影响[J].中国农业科技导报,2023,25(7):215-221. |
| REN P, LYU X G, SHI L. Effects of atmospheric pressure cold plasma continuous and interval treatments on oat seed germination[J]. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2023, 25(7): 215-221. | |
| 17 | 罗礽兰,胡道武,王静静,等.基于主成分分析和隶属函数的棉花种子萌发期耐涝性鉴定评价[J].中国棉花,2023,50(3):1-5. |
| LUO R L, HU D W, WANG J J, et al.. Identification and evaluation of waterlogging tolerance of cotton seed at germination stage based on the principal component analysis and subordinate function[J]. China Cotton, 2023, 50(3): 1-5. | |
| 18 | WEITBRECHT K, MÜLLER K, LEUBNER-METZGER G. First off the mark: early seed germination[J]. J. Exp. Bot., 2011, 62(10): 3289-3309. |
| 19 | DUBINOV A E, KOZHAYEVA J P, ZUIMATCH E A. Changing germination rate of brown mustard seeds after treatment with plasmas of nanosecond electric discharges[J]. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci., 2017, 45(2): 294-300. |
| 20 | 陈金萍,陈全家,郑凯,等.棉花萌发期抗旱指标筛选及种质资源抗旱性综合评价[J].生物技术进展,2023,13(4):556-564. |
| CHEN J P, CHEN Q J, ZHENG K, et al.. Cotton drought resistance index screening and comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance of germplasm resources during germination period[J]. Curr. Biotechnol., 2023, 13(4): 556-564. | |
| 21 | 王宝山,赵可夫.NaCl胁迫下玉米黄化苗质外体和共质体Na、Ca浓度的变化[J].作物学报,1997,23(1):27-33. |
| WANG B S, ZHAO K F. Changes in Na and Ca concentrations in the apoplast and symplast of the etiolated corn seedlings under NaCl stress[J]. Acta Agron. Sin., 1997, 23(1): 27-33. | |
| 22 | KALAJI H M, JAJOO A, OUKARROUM A, et al.. Chlorophyll a fluorescence as a tool to monitor physiological status of plants under abiotic stress conditions[J/OL]. Acta Physiol. Plant, 2016, 38(4): 102[2024-04-07]. . |
| 23 | GUO Q, WANG Y, ZHANG H, et al.. Alleviation of adverse effects of drought stress on wheat seed germination using atmospheric dielectric barrier discharge plasma treatment[J/OL]. Sci. Rep., 2017, 7(1): 16680[2024-04-07]. . |
| 24 | 李学孚,倪智敏,吴月燕,等. 盐胁迫对‘鄞红’葡萄光合特性及叶片细胞结构的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(13): 4436-4444. |
| LI X F, NI Z M, WU Y Y, et al.. Effects of salt stress on photosynthetic characteristicsand leaf cell structure of‘Yinhong’ grape[J]. J. Ecol., 2015, 35 (13): 4436-4444. | |
| 25 | YANG J Y, ZHENG W, TIAN Y, et al.. Effects of various mixed salt-alkaline stresses on growth, photosynthesis, and photosynthetic pigment concentrations of Medicago ruthenica seedlings[J]. Photosynthetica, 2011, 49(2): 275-284. |
| 26 | 刘卫国,丁俊祥,邹杰,等.NaCl对齿肋赤藓叶肉细胞超微结构的影响[J].生态学报,2016,36(12):3556-3563. |
| LIU W G, DING J X, ZOU J, et al.. Ultrastructural responses of Syntrichia caninervis to a gradient of NaCl stress[J]. Acta Ecol. Sin., 2016, 36(12): 3556-3563. | |
| 27 | CHENG T, CHEN J, ZHANG J, et al.. Physiological and proteomic analyses of leaves from the halophyte Tangut Nitraria reveals diverse response pathways critical for high salinity tolerance[J/OL]. Front. Plant Sci., 2015, 6: 30[2024-04-07]. . |
| 28 | GRIEVE C M, LESCH S M, MAAS E V, et al.. Leaf and spikelet primordia initiation in salt-stressed wheat[J]. Crop Sci., 1993, 33(6): 1286-1294. |
| 29 | 王佺珍,刘倩,高娅妮,等.植物对盐碱胁迫的响应机制研究进展[J].生态学报,2017,37(16):5565-5577. |
| WANG Q Z, LIU Q, GAO Y N, et al.. Review on the mechanisms of the response to salinity-alkalinity stress in plants[J]. Acta Ecol. Sin., 2017, 37(16): 5565-5577. | |
| 30 | 史军辉,王新英,刘茂秀,等.NaCl胁迫对胡杨幼苗叶主要渗透调节物质的影响[J].西北林学院学报,2014,29(6):6-11. |
| SHI J H, WANG X Y, LIU M X, et al.. Effects of NaCl stress on main osmotic adjustment substances in the seedling leaves of Populus euphratica [J]. J. Northwest For. Univ., 2014, 29(6): 6-11. |
| [1] | Lifeng E, Yani LI, Yu XIE, Jianhua QUAN, Xiubin CHEN, Jun HUA, Xuemei ZHAO, Wenqin ZHAO. Physiological and Photosynthetic Responses of Brassica pekinensis Seedlings to Salt Stress Alleviation by Chitosan Oligosaccharide [J]. Current Biotechnology, 2025, 15(4): 675-682. |
| [2] | Zhuoying LIU, Xiaojin ZHOU, Yanli HUANG, Sen PANG. Joint Transcriptome Analysis of Maize Under Salt Stress and MeJA Treatment [J]. Current Biotechnology, 2025, 15(2): 263-275. |
| [3] | Wenbo MA, Yiqun PAN, Qun WANG, Zhuang MA, Minglian WANG, Yishu YANG. Preliminary Study on the Application of Graphene-coated Iron Nitride Magnetic Beads to Capture Lung Cancer Circulating Tumor Cells [J]. Current Biotechnology, 2023, 13(4): 628-636. |
| [4] | ZHANG Xiangxiang, TENG Yantong, CHEN Tao*. Research on AtEXD Participating in Response to Salt Stress in Plant [J]. Curr. Biotech., 2021, 11(1): 61-68. |
| [5] | MA Yongkai1, TAO Hongbing1,2, LI Wenru1, XIE Xiaobao1*, SHI Qingshan1, ZHOU Shaolu1. Analysis of Microbial Community Structure and Diversity in Waterborne Coatings [J]. Curr. Biotech., 2019, 9(4): 396-403. |
| [6] | CHEN Xinbing, HUANG Rongfeng*, WANG Juan*. Map-based Cloning and Function Analysis of Rice Dwarf Mutant D814 [J]. Curr. Biotech., 2017, 7(6): 608-617. |
| [7] | MING Jiajia1, YIN Hongqing1, ZHU Yunfen1, LI Weidong1, CHEN Daqing2, YANG Yongkang1, YANG Chaodong3, CHEN Feifei1, LI Yajie1, YE Ziyun1, WAN Haiying1, LONG Lan1, WEN Xiaolong1, XIANG Jiqian1*. Effects of Selenate Stress on the Growth and Physiological Indexes of Cardamine violifolia O. E. Schulz During Seedling Stage [J]. Curr. Biotech., 2017, 7(5): 486-492. |
| [8] | HUANG Xiao-mo1,2, TAO Hong-bing1, QIU Xiao-ying2, LI Liang-qiu1, SHI Qing-shan1. Analysis of Waterborne Coating Bacterial Diversity by the 16S rRNA Gene Library [J]. Curr. Biotech., 2016, 6(4): 295-298. |
| [9] | YANG Hai-feng1, LIU Jing-hui1, WANG Jun-ying2*. Determination and Analysis of Na+, K+ and Ca2+ Flow in Different Oat Varieties under Saline-Alkali Stress [J]. Curr. Biotech., 2014, 4(3): 192-196. |
| [10] | GAO Wen-chao1, WANG Xue-zhu2, ZHANG Sheng-gang2, QU Lei3, GAO Zhi-min1, LEI An-min1*, YIN Hai-ke2, WANG Zhong-lin2, REN Bao-hua2. Study on Superovulation of Different Varieties of Goats [J]. Curr. Biotech., 2013, 3(5): 353-356. |
| [11] | XI Yu-qin, MA Chun-lin, CAO Yun-tao, KONG Wei-bao, YANG Hong. Physiological Response of Autotrophy and Polyculture Chlorella vulgaris to Salt Stress [J]. Curr. Biotech., 2013, 3(3): 223-228. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||