Current Biotechnology ›› 2026, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (1): 131-139.DOI: 10.19586/j.2095-2341.2025.0114
• Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
Menghua ZHANG1,2(
), Yuanhang QU2, Peipei WANG2(
), Lihong DONG2, Jiaqi ZHANG2, Yifan FU2, Wei YANG2, Qinggang GUO2, Shezeng LI2, Xuejun WEI1(
)
Received:2025-08-27
Accepted:2025-10-24
Online:2026-01-25
Published:2026-02-12
Contact:
Peipei WANG,Xuejun WEI
CLC Number:
Menghua ZHANG, Yuanhang QU, Peipei WANG, Lihong DONG, Jiaqi ZHANG, Yifan FU, Wei YANG, Qinggang GUO, Shezeng LI, Xuejun WEI. Screening and Optimization of Fermentation Medium for Biocontrol Bacillus velezensis SD23LJ1314[J]. Current Biotechnology, 2026, 16(1): 131-139.
张梦华, 曲远航, 王培培, 董丽红, 张家齐, 付一帆, 杨威, 郭庆港, 李社增, 魏学军. 生防贝莱斯芽孢杆菌SD23LJ1314发酵培养基的筛选及优化[J]. 生物技术进展, 2026, 16(1): 131-139.
| 培养基编号 | 配方 |
|---|---|
| 1 | 玉米粉30.0 g·L-1、葡萄糖2.0 g·L-1、黄豆粉20.0 g·L-1、麸皮5.0 g·L-1、 NaCl 4.0 g·L-1 |
| 2 | 玉米粉30.0 g·L-1、黄豆粉30.0 g·L-1、K2HPO4·3H2O 4.0 g·L-1、MgSO4·7H2O 1.5 g·L-1 |
| 3 | 葡萄糖10.0 g·L-1、黄豆粉10.0 g·L-1、NaCl 5.0 g·L-1、MnSO4·7H2O·0.6 g·L-1 |
| 4 | 蛋白胨10.0 g·L-1、酵母浸膏5.0 g·L-1、葡萄糖1.0 g·L-1、K2HPO4·3H2O 0.2 g·L-1、MgSO4·7H2O 0.2 g·L-1 |
| 5 | 玉米粉50.0 g·L-1、葡萄糖8.0 g·L-1、豆粕粉20.0 g·L-1、麸皮20.0 g·L-1、NaCl 4.0 g·L-1 |
| 6 | 玉米粉17.0 g·L-1、葡萄糖10.0 g·L-1、黄豆粉23.0 g·L-1、麦芽糖10.0 g·L-1、酵母浸膏5.0 g·L-1 |
| 7 | 玉米粉5.0 g·L-1、葡萄糖3.0 g·L-1、豆饼粉5.0 g·L-1、鱼粉3.0 g·L-1 |
| 8 | 玉米粉40.0 g·L-1、豆饼粉30.0 g·L-1、酵母粉5.0 g·L-1、K2HPO4·3H2O 5.0 g·L-1、MgSO4·7H2O 1.5 g·L-1 |
Table 1 Basic mediums for Bacillus
| 培养基编号 | 配方 |
|---|---|
| 1 | 玉米粉30.0 g·L-1、葡萄糖2.0 g·L-1、黄豆粉20.0 g·L-1、麸皮5.0 g·L-1、 NaCl 4.0 g·L-1 |
| 2 | 玉米粉30.0 g·L-1、黄豆粉30.0 g·L-1、K2HPO4·3H2O 4.0 g·L-1、MgSO4·7H2O 1.5 g·L-1 |
| 3 | 葡萄糖10.0 g·L-1、黄豆粉10.0 g·L-1、NaCl 5.0 g·L-1、MnSO4·7H2O·0.6 g·L-1 |
| 4 | 蛋白胨10.0 g·L-1、酵母浸膏5.0 g·L-1、葡萄糖1.0 g·L-1、K2HPO4·3H2O 0.2 g·L-1、MgSO4·7H2O 0.2 g·L-1 |
| 5 | 玉米粉50.0 g·L-1、葡萄糖8.0 g·L-1、豆粕粉20.0 g·L-1、麸皮20.0 g·L-1、NaCl 4.0 g·L-1 |
| 6 | 玉米粉17.0 g·L-1、葡萄糖10.0 g·L-1、黄豆粉23.0 g·L-1、麦芽糖10.0 g·L-1、酵母浸膏5.0 g·L-1 |
| 7 | 玉米粉5.0 g·L-1、葡萄糖3.0 g·L-1、豆饼粉5.0 g·L-1、鱼粉3.0 g·L-1 |
| 8 | 玉米粉40.0 g·L-1、豆饼粉30.0 g·L-1、酵母粉5.0 g·L-1、K2HPO4·3H2O 5.0 g·L-1、MgSO4·7H2O 1.5 g·L-1 |
| 水平 | 因素/(g·L-1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A:果糖 | B:酵母粉 | C | D:NaCl | E:MnSO4·7H2O | F | |
| -1 | 10 | 10 | - | 5.0 | 0.6 | - |
| 1 | 15 | 15 | - | 7.5 | 0.9 | - |
Table 2 Factors and levels of Plackett-Burman experiment
| 水平 | 因素/(g·L-1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A:果糖 | B:酵母粉 | C | D:NaCl | E:MnSO4·7H2O | F | |
| -1 | 10 | 10 | - | 5.0 | 0.6 | - |
| 1 | 15 | 15 | - | 7.5 | 0.9 | - |
| 水平 | 因素/(g·L-1) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A:果糖 | B:酵母粉 | C:NaCl | D:MnSO4·7H2O | |
| -1 | 10.0 | 15.00 | 5.00 | 0.60 |
| 0 | 12.5 | 18.75 | 6.25 | 0.75 |
| 1 | 15.0 | 22.50 | 7.50 | 0.90 |
Table 3 Factors and level design of Box-Behnken experiment
| 水平 | 因素/(g·L-1) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A:果糖 | B:酵母粉 | C:NaCl | D:MnSO4·7H2O | |
| -1 | 10.0 | 15.00 | 5.00 | 0.60 |
| 0 | 12.5 | 18.75 | 6.25 | 0.75 |
| 1 | 15.0 | 22.50 | 7.50 | 0.90 |
| 编号 | A:果糖/(g·L-1) | B:酵母粉/(g·L-1) | D:NaCl/(g·L-1) | E:MnSO4·7H2O/(g·L-1) | 菌体量/(107 CFU·mL-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 7.5 | 0.6 | 178.00 |
| 2 | 10.0 | 15.0 | 7.5 | 0.6 | 712.40 |
| 3 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 5.0 | 0.9 | 445.20 |
| 4 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 5.0 | 0.9 | 133.60 |
| 5 | 15.0 | 10.0 | 7.5 | 0.9 | 44.50 |
| 6 | 15.0 | 10.0 | 7.5 | 0.6 | 89.10 |
| 7 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 5.0 | 0.9 | 160.30 |
| 8 | 10.0 | 15.0 | 7.5 | 0.9 | 801.40 |
| 9 | 10.0 | 15.0 | 5.0 | 0.6 | 756.90 |
| 10 | 30.0 | 10.0 | 5.0 | 0.6 | 356.20 |
| 11 | 15.0 | 10.0 | 5.0 | 0.6 | 106.90 |
| 12 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 7.5 | 0.9 | 400.70 |
Table 4 Experimental designs of Plackett-Burman and corresponding thallus concentrations
| 编号 | A:果糖/(g·L-1) | B:酵母粉/(g·L-1) | D:NaCl/(g·L-1) | E:MnSO4·7H2O/(g·L-1) | 菌体量/(107 CFU·mL-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 7.5 | 0.6 | 178.00 |
| 2 | 10.0 | 15.0 | 7.5 | 0.6 | 712.40 |
| 3 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 5.0 | 0.9 | 445.20 |
| 4 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 5.0 | 0.9 | 133.60 |
| 5 | 15.0 | 10.0 | 7.5 | 0.9 | 44.50 |
| 6 | 15.0 | 10.0 | 7.5 | 0.6 | 89.10 |
| 7 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 5.0 | 0.9 | 160.30 |
| 8 | 10.0 | 15.0 | 7.5 | 0.9 | 801.40 |
| 9 | 10.0 | 15.0 | 5.0 | 0.6 | 756.90 |
| 10 | 30.0 | 10.0 | 5.0 | 0.6 | 356.20 |
| 11 | 15.0 | 10.0 | 5.0 | 0.6 | 106.90 |
| 12 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 7.5 | 0.9 | 400.70 |
| 自由度 | 平方和 | 均方 | F | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 模型 | 4 | 785 619 | 196 405 | 23.06 | 0.001 |
| 线性 | 4 | 785 619 | 196 405 | 23.06 | 0.001 |
| 果糖(A) | 1 | 635 013 | 635 013 | 74.55 | 0.001 |
| 酵母粉(B) | 1 | 140 853 | 140 853 | 16.54 | 0.005 |
| NaCl(D) | 1 | 5 947 | 5 947 | 0.70 | 0.431 |
| MnSO4·7H2O(E) | 1 | 3 806 | 3 806 | 0.45 | 0.525 |
| 误差 | 2 | 59 629 | 8 518 | ||
| 合计 | 11 | 845 248 | |||
| R2=0.929 5 | R |
Table 5 Analysis of variance of results of Plackett-Burman experiment
| 自由度 | 平方和 | 均方 | F | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 模型 | 4 | 785 619 | 196 405 | 23.06 | 0.001 |
| 线性 | 4 | 785 619 | 196 405 | 23.06 | 0.001 |
| 果糖(A) | 1 | 635 013 | 635 013 | 74.55 | 0.001 |
| 酵母粉(B) | 1 | 140 853 | 140 853 | 16.54 | 0.005 |
| NaCl(D) | 1 | 5 947 | 5 947 | 0.70 | 0.431 |
| MnSO4·7H2O(E) | 1 | 3 806 | 3 806 | 0.45 | 0.525 |
| 误差 | 2 | 59 629 | 8 518 | ||
| 合计 | 11 | 845 248 | |||
| R2=0.929 5 | R |
| 编号 | 果糖/(g·L-1) | 酵母粉/(g·L-1) | NaCl/(g·L-1) | MnSO4·7H2O/(g·L-1) | 响应值/(107 CFU·mL-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12.5 | 18.75 | 5.00 | 0.60 | 756.90 |
| 2 | 10.0 | 18.75 | 7.50 | 0.75 | 445.24 |
| 3 | 12.5 | 15.00 | 6.25 | 0.60 | 463.05 |
| 4 | 12.5 | 18.75 | 6.25 | 0.75 | 801.42 |
| 5 | 12.5 | 18.75 | 5.00 | 0.90 | 774.71 |
| 6 | 10.0 | 18.75 | 6.25 | 0.90 | 427.43 |
| 7 | 12.5 | 15.00 | 7.50 | 0.75 | 471.95 |
| 8 | 15.0 | 18.75 | 6.25 | 0.90 | 623.33 |
| 9 | 12.5 | 22.50 | 5.00 | 0.75 | 765.81 |
| 10 | 15.0 | 15.00 | 6.25 | 0.75 | 427.43 |
| 11 | 12.5 | 18.75 | 6.25 | 0.75 | 819.23 |
| 12 | 12.5 | 22.50 | 6.25 | 0.60 | 792.52 |
| 13 | 10.0 | 22.50 | 6.25 | 0.75 | 400.71 |
| 14 | 10.0 | 18.75 | 5.00 | 0.75 | 409.62 |
| 15 | 12.5 | 18.75 | 6.25 | 0.75 | 810.33 |
| 16 | 10.0 | 15.00 | 6.25 | 0.75 | 267.14 |
| 17 | 15.0 | 18.75 | 5.00 | 0.75 | 667.85 |
| 18 | 12.5 | 15.00 | 5.00 | 0.75 | 463.05 |
| 19 | 15.0 | 18.75 | 6.25 | 0.60 | 650.04 |
| 20 | 12.5 | 22.50 | 6.25 | 0.90 | 783.62 |
| 21 | 10.0 | 18.75 | 6.25 | 0.60 | 427.43 |
| 22 | 15.0 | 22.50 | 6.25 | 0.75 | 765.81 |
| 23 | 15.0 | 18.75 | 7.50 | 0.75 | 641.14 |
| 24 | 12.5 | 18.75 | 7.50 | 0.60 | 774.71 |
| 25 | 12.5 | 15.00 | 6.25 | 0.90 | 471.95 |
| 26 | 12.5 | 18.75 | 6.25 | 0.75 | 87.58 |
| 27 | 12.5 | 18.75 | 6.25 | 0.75 | 805.88 |
| 28 | 12.5 | 22.50 | 7.50 | 0.75 | 756.90 |
| 29 | 12.5 | 18.75 | 7.50 | 0.90 | 779.16 |
Table 6 The design and results of response surface experiment
| 编号 | 果糖/(g·L-1) | 酵母粉/(g·L-1) | NaCl/(g·L-1) | MnSO4·7H2O/(g·L-1) | 响应值/(107 CFU·mL-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12.5 | 18.75 | 5.00 | 0.60 | 756.90 |
| 2 | 10.0 | 18.75 | 7.50 | 0.75 | 445.24 |
| 3 | 12.5 | 15.00 | 6.25 | 0.60 | 463.05 |
| 4 | 12.5 | 18.75 | 6.25 | 0.75 | 801.42 |
| 5 | 12.5 | 18.75 | 5.00 | 0.90 | 774.71 |
| 6 | 10.0 | 18.75 | 6.25 | 0.90 | 427.43 |
| 7 | 12.5 | 15.00 | 7.50 | 0.75 | 471.95 |
| 8 | 15.0 | 18.75 | 6.25 | 0.90 | 623.33 |
| 9 | 12.5 | 22.50 | 5.00 | 0.75 | 765.81 |
| 10 | 15.0 | 15.00 | 6.25 | 0.75 | 427.43 |
| 11 | 12.5 | 18.75 | 6.25 | 0.75 | 819.23 |
| 12 | 12.5 | 22.50 | 6.25 | 0.60 | 792.52 |
| 13 | 10.0 | 22.50 | 6.25 | 0.75 | 400.71 |
| 14 | 10.0 | 18.75 | 5.00 | 0.75 | 409.62 |
| 15 | 12.5 | 18.75 | 6.25 | 0.75 | 810.33 |
| 16 | 10.0 | 15.00 | 6.25 | 0.75 | 267.14 |
| 17 | 15.0 | 18.75 | 5.00 | 0.75 | 667.85 |
| 18 | 12.5 | 15.00 | 5.00 | 0.75 | 463.05 |
| 19 | 15.0 | 18.75 | 6.25 | 0.60 | 650.04 |
| 20 | 12.5 | 22.50 | 6.25 | 0.90 | 783.62 |
| 21 | 10.0 | 18.75 | 6.25 | 0.60 | 427.43 |
| 22 | 15.0 | 22.50 | 6.25 | 0.75 | 765.81 |
| 23 | 15.0 | 18.75 | 7.50 | 0.75 | 641.14 |
| 24 | 12.5 | 18.75 | 7.50 | 0.60 | 774.71 |
| 25 | 12.5 | 15.00 | 6.25 | 0.90 | 471.95 |
| 26 | 12.5 | 18.75 | 6.25 | 0.75 | 87.58 |
| 27 | 12.5 | 18.75 | 6.25 | 0.75 | 805.88 |
| 28 | 12.5 | 22.50 | 7.50 | 0.75 | 756.90 |
| 29 | 12.5 | 18.75 | 7.50 | 0.90 | 779.16 |
| 自由度 | 平方和 | 均方 | F | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2=0.982 9 | R | ||||
| 模型 | 14 | 1 045 707.11 | 74 693.37 | 56.774 05 | 7.29E-10 |
| A-果糖 | 1 | 205 408.33 | 205 408.33 | 156.129 8 | 5.56E-09 |
| B-酵母粉 | 1 | 304 008.33 | 304 008.33 | 231.075 2 | 4.27E-10 |
| C-NaCl | 1 | 102.08 | 102.08 | 0.077 593 | 0.784 658 |
| D-MnSO4·7H2O | 1 | 2.08 | 2.08 | 0.001 584 | 0.968 82 |
| AB | 1 | 13 225.00 | 13 225.00 | 10.052 26 | 0.006 808 |
| AC | 1 | 1 225.00 | 1 225.00 | 0.931 116 | 0.350 946 |
| AD | 1 | 225 | 225 | 0.171 021 | 0.685 471 |
| BC | 1 | 100 | 100 | 0.076 01 | 0.786 808 |
| BD | 1 | 100 | 100 | 0.076 01 | 0.786 808 |
| C | 1 | 56.25 | 56.25 | 0.042 755 | 0.839 164 |
| A2 | 1 | 425 236.77 | 425 236.77 | 323.220 3 | 4.54E-11 |
| B2 | 1 | 168 223.25 | 168 223.25 | 127.865 7 | 2E-08 |
| C2 | 1 | 9 325.45 | 9 325.45 | 7.088 228 | 0.018 575 |
| D2 | 1 | 8 136.26 | 8 136.26 | 6.184 332 | 0.026 123 |
| 误差 | 14 | 18 418.75 | 1 315.63 | ||
| 纯误差 | 4 | 250 | 62.5 | ||
| 合计 | 28 | 2 199 749.66 | 1 211 445.30 | ||
Table 7 Analysis of variance of the results of Box-Behnken experiment
| 自由度 | 平方和 | 均方 | F | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2=0.982 9 | R | ||||
| 模型 | 14 | 1 045 707.11 | 74 693.37 | 56.774 05 | 7.29E-10 |
| A-果糖 | 1 | 205 408.33 | 205 408.33 | 156.129 8 | 5.56E-09 |
| B-酵母粉 | 1 | 304 008.33 | 304 008.33 | 231.075 2 | 4.27E-10 |
| C-NaCl | 1 | 102.08 | 102.08 | 0.077 593 | 0.784 658 |
| D-MnSO4·7H2O | 1 | 2.08 | 2.08 | 0.001 584 | 0.968 82 |
| AB | 1 | 13 225.00 | 13 225.00 | 10.052 26 | 0.006 808 |
| AC | 1 | 1 225.00 | 1 225.00 | 0.931 116 | 0.350 946 |
| AD | 1 | 225 | 225 | 0.171 021 | 0.685 471 |
| BC | 1 | 100 | 100 | 0.076 01 | 0.786 808 |
| BD | 1 | 100 | 100 | 0.076 01 | 0.786 808 |
| C | 1 | 56.25 | 56.25 | 0.042 755 | 0.839 164 |
| A2 | 1 | 425 236.77 | 425 236.77 | 323.220 3 | 4.54E-11 |
| B2 | 1 | 168 223.25 | 168 223.25 | 127.865 7 | 2E-08 |
| C2 | 1 | 9 325.45 | 9 325.45 | 7.088 228 | 0.018 575 |
| D2 | 1 | 8 136.26 | 8 136.26 | 6.184 332 | 0.026 123 |
| 误差 | 14 | 18 418.75 | 1 315.63 | ||
| 纯误差 | 4 | 250 | 62.5 | ||
| 合计 | 28 | 2 199 749.66 | 1 211 445.30 | ||
| [1] | 张慧,许宁,曹丽茹,等.我国微生物农药的研发与应用研究进展[J].农药学学报,2023,25(4):769-778. |
| ZHANG H, XU N, CAO L R, et al.. Review on research and utilization of microbial pesticides in China[J]. Chin. J. Pestic. Sci., 2023, 25(4): 769-778. | |
| [2] | 李铮,王艳,晋玲,等.短小芽孢杆菌DST27发酵培养基及发酵条件的优化[J].农药,2024,63(7):500-506. |
| LI Z, WANG Y, JIN L, et al.. Optimization of fermentation medium and conditions for Bacillus pumilus DST27[J]. Agrochemicals, 2024, 63(7): 500-506. | |
| [3] | 孙昊,董素芬,李雪,等.小麦茎基腐病生防菌P61的分离鉴定及发酵条件筛选[J].植物保护学报,2025,52(2):366-378. |
| SUN H, DONG S F, LI X, et al.. Isolation and identification of biocontrol bacterium P61 against wheat stem rot and screening of fermentation conditions[J]. J. Plant Prot., 2025, 52(2): 366-378. | |
| [4] | ZENG X, WANG H, HE L, et al.. Medium optimization of carbon and nitrogen sources for the production of eucalyptene A and xyloketal A from Xylaria sp. 2508 using response surface methodology[J]. Process. Biochem., 2006, 41(2): 293-298. |
| [5] | RAO Y K, TSAY K J, WU W S, et al.. Medium optimization of carbon and nitrogen sources for the production of spores from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens B128 using response surface methodology[J]. Process. Biochem., 2007, 42(4): 535-541. |
| [6] | 孙松,韩慧敏,高玉平,等.解淀粉芽胞杆菌CY3的分离鉴定、发酵条件筛选及其对烟草镰刀菌根腐病的防治效果评价[J].中国生物防治学报,2025,41(4):916-926. |
| SUN S, HAN H M, GAO Y P, et al.. Screening, identification and fermentation condition optimization of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens CY3 and its control effects on Fusarium root rot of tobacco[J]. Chin. J. Biol. Control, 2025, 41(4): 916-926. | |
| [7] | 张荣胜,黄如宇,乔俊卿,等.贝莱斯芽胞杆菌Jt84高产伊枯草菌素的发酵优化[J].中国生物防治学报,2025,41(1):80-90. |
| ZHANG R S, HUANG R Y, QIAO J Q, et al.. Optimization of fermentation for iturin high production of Bacillus velezensis Jt84[J]. Chin. J. Biol. Control, 2025, 41(1): 80-90. | |
| [8] | 高晓晶,张祝兰,林仙菊,等.基于响应面法优化环孢菌素A发酵工艺的研究[J].生物技术进展,2025,15(3):518-525. |
| GAO X J, ZHANG Z L, LIN X J, et al.. Optimization of fermentation culture conditions for cyclosporine a using response surface method[J]. Curr. Biotechnol., 2025, 15(3): 518-525. | |
| [9] | 盖宏宇.辣椒疫病生防菌和辣椒促生菌的筛选及应用[D].保定:河北农业大学,2024. |
| [10] | YASEEN Y, GANCEL F, BÉCHET M, et al.. Study of the correlation between fengycin promoter expression and its production by Bacillus subtilis under different culture conditions and the impact on surfactin production[J]. Arch. Microbiol., 2017, 199(10): 1371-1382. |
| [11] | 刘春红,张丽霞,李燕,等.枯草芽胞杆菌B201产芽孢培养基优化[J].中国生物防治学报,2016,32(5):650-656. |
| LIU C H, ZHANG L X, LI Y, et al.. Optimization of sporulation medium of Bacillus subtilis B201[J]. Chin. J. Biol. Control, 2016, 32(5): 650-656. | |
| [12] | 张丽霞.枯草芽孢杆菌B908发酵工艺优化研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2006. |
| [13] | JIN H, ZHANG X, LI K, et al.. Direct bio-utilization of untreated rapeseed meal for effective iturin A production by Bacillus subtilis in submerged fermentation[J/OL]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(10): e111171[2025-12-21]. . |
| [14] | 卢彩鸽,董红平,张殿朋,等.解淀粉芽胞杆菌MH71摇瓶发酵培养基及发酵条件优化[J].中国生物防治学报,2015,31(3):369-377. |
| LU C G, DONG H P, ZHANG D P, et al.. Optimization of fermentation medium components and cultural conditions for Bacillus amyloliquefaciens MH71 in flask[J]. Chin. J. Biol. Control, 2015, 31(3): 369-377. | |
| [15] | 朱峰,王继春,田成丽,等.枯草芽胞杆菌GB519发酵液菌体数量和芽胞率检测方法的比较[J].东北农业科学,2019,44(6):49-52. |
| ZHU F, WANG J C, TIAN C L, et al.. Methods comparison for detecting sporular amount and sporulation efficiency of Bacillus subtilis GB519[J]. J. Northeast. Agric. Sci., 2019, 44(6): 49-52. | |
| [16] | 竺利红,邱海萍,项慧娟,等.山核桃内生细菌ZL34的鉴定、抑菌活性及发酵培养基优化[J].中国生物防治学报,2024,40(4):894-904. |
| ZHU L H, QIU H P, XIANG H J, et al.. Identification, antimicrobial activity, and optimization of fermentation medium of endophytic bacterium strain ZL34 from Carya cathayensis [J]. Chin. J. Biol. Control, 2024, 40(4): 894-904. | |
| [17] | 曲远航,郭庆港,李社增,等.生防枯草芽孢杆菌HMB19198发酵培养基的筛选及优化[J].农药学学报,2022,24(3):509-519. |
| QU Y H, GUO Q G, LI S Z, et al.. Screening and optimization of Bacillus subtilis HMB19198 fermentation medium[J]. Chin. J. Pestic. Sci., 2022, 24(3): 509-519. | |
| [18] | 刘芳,权婷婷,王开梅,等.响应面法优化梨黑斑病生防链霉菌SZF-179发酵培养基[J].中国生物防治学报,2024,40(4):936-947. |
| LIU F, QUAN T T, WANG K M, et al.. Optimization of fermentation media through response surface methodology for Streptomyces odonnellii SZF-179 against Alternaria alternata [J]. Chin. J. Biol. Control, 2024, 40(4): 936-947. | |
| [19] | 杨昌发,唐彩艳,孙冰,等.橘绿木霉GF-11发酵刺梨渣的响应面法优化[J].中国生物防治学报,2024,40(2):448-457. |
| YANG C F, TANG C Y, SUN B, et al.. Optimization of solid-state fermentation process of Trichoderma citrinoviride GF-11 on Rosa roxburghii tratt pomace by response surface methodology[J]. Chin. J. Biol. Control, 2024, 40(2): 448-457. | |
| [20] | 乔俊卿,孙凯,刘永锋,等.芽胞杆菌工程菌株B9BD产表面活性素发酵培养基优化[J].中国生物防治学报,2022,38(2):383-392. |
| QIAO J Q, SUN K, LIU Y F, et al.. Optimization of fermentation medium for the production of surfactin by engineered strain B9BD of Bacillus subtilis [J]. Chin. J. Biol. Control, 2022, 38(2): 383-392. | |
| [21] | 韩德权,王莘.微生物发酵工艺学原理[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2013. |
| [22] | 范寒雪,邹世杰,章圣龙,等.嗜冷假单胞菌BYAU-6的分离及低温秸秆降解能力解析[J].微生物学报,2025,65(8):3273-3286. |
| FAN H X, ZOU S J, ZHANG S L, et al.. Isolation of Pseudomonas psychrophila BYAU-6 capable of degrading straw at low temperatures[J]. Acta Microbiol. Sin., 2025, 65(8): 3273-3286. | |
| [23] | 宋琦,宋晓雅,焦永鑫,等.防御假单胞菌FD6对番茄灰霉病菌的抑菌活性及其培养条件优化[J].园艺学报,2025,52(9):2545-2553. |
| SONG Q, SONG X Y, JIAO Y X, et al.. Antifungal activity of Pseudomonas protegens FD6 against Botrytis cinerea and optimization of its culture conditions[J]. Acta Hortic. Sin., 2025, 52(9): 2545-2553. | |
| [24] | ABD-ELHALEM B T, EL-SAWY M, GAMAL R F, et al.. Production of amylases from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens under submerged fermentation using some agro-industrial by-products[J]. Ann. Agric. Sci., 2015, 60(2): 193-202. |
| [25] | 刘悦,翟乾行,刘雪微,等.降解莠去津和乙草胺的原生质体融合菌株RH-92的构建及其培养条件优化[J].农药学学报,2025,27(3):424-434. |
| LIU Y, ZHAI Q H, LIU X W, et al.. Construction of protoplast fusion strain RH-92 for degrading atrazine and acetochlor and optimization of its culture conditions[J]. Chin. J. Pestic. Sci., 2025, 27(3): 424-434. |
| [1] | Xinyang LI, Yang YANG, Dong LIU, Yuguang LIU, Junze LIU, Changbao CHEN, Huan WANG, Shumin WANG. Optimization of Liquid Fermentation Conditions for Mycelial Biomass and Exopolysaccharide Production of Simplicillium lanosoniveum [J]. Current Biotechnology, 2024, 14(6): 937-946. |
| [2] | Bowen WANG, Jinxing WANG, Chengyao QIU, Qingxian QIN, Juxiang WANG, Bo YAO, Hongyan LI, Guanxin TAN, Yingwei YANG, Guanghai JI. Control of Tobacco Bacterial Wilt by Bacillus velezensis Combined with Calcium-containing Soil Conditioner [J]. Current Biotechnology, 2024, 14(5): 839-847. |
| [3] | HUANG Shengbo, XIE Jianhua, ZHEN Shuai, FENG Fei*, JIN Liang, ZHANG Lei. Catalytic Cracking of Biomass Tar with Calcium-based Catalyst [J]. Curr. Biotech., 2020, 10(3): 299-303. |
| [4] | WANG Yingyan, CHEN Wenna*, JIA Cunjiang, FANG Shubiao, QIN Bin, ZHU Zhengqiao. Study on Fermentation Process of Lycopene Production [J]. Curr. Biotech., 2020, 10(3): 320-327. |
| [5] | ZHAO Pengnian, YANG Deyu, WANG Jiayou, DING Yifan, AN Peng, WANG Yuan*. Isolation and Identification of a Nitrite Bacterium and its Optimization of Fermentation Process [J]. Curr. Biotech., 2019, 9(1): 69-77. |
| [6] | ZHENG Wei1,2, ZHOU Yinghong3, LIU Jinlong4*. Response Surface Optimization of the Fermentation Process of Cordycepin by Paecilomyces varioti A20140822 [J]. Curr. Biotech., 2017, 7(6): 625-631. |
| [7] | DONG Ming, FENG Fei*, SHI Ling, TANG Jun, WEI Long. Progress on Methane Production from Bio-syngas Catalytic Synthesis [J]. Curr. Biotech., 2017, 7(3): 198-202. |
| [8] | GU Hanxue1,2, LIU Yue1, CHEN Ziqi3, LIU Yanzhi2, LIU Xiangguo2, HAO Dongyun1,2*. Research on Enhancing the Biomass of Transgenic Tobacco by Overexpression of Zmsh1 Gene from Maize [J]. Curr. Biotech., 2017, 7(3): 203-210. |
| [9] | SHEN Xiao-juan1, HE Xin-xin2, WANG Yi-bin2, DING Hai-long1, GUAN Xiong2*, DENG Bo1*. Transition of Distillers’ Grains Biomass by Alkali Pretreatment for Bacillus thuringiensis Cultivation [J]. Curr. Biotech., 2016, 6(5): 357-360. |
| [10] | ZHU Qi-li, HE Ming-xiong*, TAN Fu-rong, DAI Li-chun, WU Bo. Progress on Pretreatment Technologies of Lignocellulosic Biomass [J]. Curr. Biotech., 2015, 5(6): 414-419. |
| [11] | QIU Qing\|qing, REN Xiu\|lian, WU Ze, CHEN Yong\|xing, WEI Qi\|feng*. Review of Algae Biomass Resources Conversion [J]. Curr. Biotech., 2015, 5(3): 153-157. |
| [12] | . Research Progress of Zymomonas mobilis on Biorefinery System [J]. Curr. Biotech., 2014, 4(5): 331-339. |
| [13] | CHEN Peng1,2, WANG Ning-bo2, LI Su-yue2, YAN Xiao-juan2, XIONG Min-hui2, LI Hong-yu1, LIANG Ning2. Research Progress on Arsenic Bio-adsorption [J]. Curr. Biotech., 2014, 4(3): 177-181. |
| [14] | YANG Yu-qiong, LU Shi-yuan. GC-MS Analysis of Biomass Tar Distillate Composition under Different Temperature [J]. Curr. Biotech., 2014, 4(1): 54-58. |
| [15] | FENG Fei, SONG Guo-hui, SHEN Lai-hong, XIAO Jun. Simulation of Synthetic Natural Gas (SNG) Production from Biomass Gasification [J]. Current Biotechnology, 2012, 2(6): 428-435. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||