生物技术进展 ›› 2026, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (1): 76-85.DOI: 10.19586/j.2095-2341.2025.0123
任晓春1(
), 刘欣1, 韩莹1, 端凯1, 刘峰2, 郝瑞丽3, 斯欢3, 黄应群4(
), 夏建军1(
)
收稿日期:2025-09-16
接受日期:2025-11-12
出版日期:2026-01-25
发布日期:2026-02-12
通讯作者:
黄应群,夏建军
作者简介:任晓春 E-mail: renxiaochunw@163.com
基金资助:
Xiaochun REN1(
), Xin LIU1, Ying HAN1, Kai DUAN1, Feng LIU2, Ruili HAO3, Huan SI3, Yingqun HUANG4(
), Jianjun XIA1(
)
Received:2025-09-16
Accepted:2025-11-12
Online:2026-01-25
Published:2026-02-12
Contact:
Yingqun HUANG,Jianjun XIA
摘要:
氮肥施用量是影响烟叶产量与品质的重要因素,但在实际生产中普遍存在施氮量偏高的现象,造成烟叶产量与品质之间的矛盾。为明确适宜施氮范围并提升烟叶生产效益,以‘云烟87’为试验材料,设置低氮(纯氮135 kg·hm-2)、中氮(150 kg·hm-2)和高氮(165 kg·hm-2)3个施氮梯度,通过田间试验系统评价其对农艺性状、产量、产值及外观、感官、物理特性及致香成分的影响。试验结果表明,高氮处理组可显著促进植株的生长发育,株高较中氮和低氮分别提高了6.0%和11.7%,叶宽提升了9.3%~13.3%;烤后烟叶产量分别提升了7.4%和18.4%,外观质量评分亦有所提升。然而,高氮处理会显著降低致香成分积累,中部叶总致香成分含量为低氮组的86.6%,多项感官评价指标得分也低于低氮组。而低氮处理导致烟叶产量下降10%以上,但萜烯类等致香成分显著积累,感官质量表现也更优。由此表明,优化氮肥施用是实现烟叶产量与品质协调统一的关键途径,过量施氮虽能提升产量与外观品质,但会降低烟叶中致香成分的积累从而削弱其内在品质,应根据生产实际优化当前的施氮策略,以保障烟叶优质高效生产和行业可持续发展。
中图分类号:
任晓春, 刘欣, 韩莹, 端凯, 刘峰, 郝瑞丽, 斯欢, 黄应群, 夏建军. 施氮量对‘云烟87’产量和质量形成及致香成分积累的影响[J]. 生物技术进展, 2026, 16(1): 76-85.
Xiaochun REN, Xin LIU, Ying HAN, Kai DUAN, Feng LIU, Ruili HAO, Huan SI, Yingqun HUANG, Jianjun XIA. Effects of Nitrogen Application on Yield-quality Formation and Aroma Compounds Accumulation in Flue-cured Tobacco ‘Yunyan 87’[J]. Current Biotechnology, 2026, 16(1): 76-85.
| 处理 | 株高/cm | 叶数/片 | 叶长/cm | 叶宽/cm | 茎围/cm | 节距/cm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T3 | 124.0±2.24a | 19.4±0.55a | 73.2±1.30a | 30.6±0.89a | 8.3±0.27a | 6.4±0.22a |
| T2 | 117.0±1.87b | 18.8±0.45a | 73.4±1.14a | 28.0±0.71b | 7.9±0.22a | 6.2±0.18b |
| T1 | 111.0±1.58c | 19.4±0.55a | 73.8±1.10a | 27.0±0.63c | 8.2±0.18a | 5.7±0.16c |
表1 不同氮肥处理下‘云烟87’主要农艺性状调查表
Table 1 Agronomic traits of 'Yunyan 87' under different nitrogen treatments
| 处理 | 株高/cm | 叶数/片 | 叶长/cm | 叶宽/cm | 茎围/cm | 节距/cm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T3 | 124.0±2.24a | 19.4±0.55a | 73.2±1.30a | 30.6±0.89a | 8.3±0.27a | 6.4±0.22a |
| T2 | 117.0±1.87b | 18.8±0.45a | 73.4±1.14a | 28.0±0.71b | 7.9±0.22a | 6.2±0.18b |
| T1 | 111.0±1.58c | 19.4±0.55a | 73.8±1.10a | 27.0±0.63c | 8.2±0.18a | 5.7±0.16c |
| 处理 | 颜色 | 成熟度 | 结构 | 身份 | 油分 | 色度 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T3 | 金黄 | 成熟 | 疏松 | 中等 | 有 | 中等 |
| T2 | 金黄 | 成熟 | 疏松 | 中等 | 有 | 中等 |
| T1 | 正黄 | 成熟 | 疏松 | 稍薄 | 有 | 中等 |
表2 不同施肥处理条件下‘云烟87’外观评价
Table 2 Appearance evaluation of 'Yunyan 87' under different nitrogen treatments
| 处理 | 颜色 | 成熟度 | 结构 | 身份 | 油分 | 色度 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T3 | 金黄 | 成熟 | 疏松 | 中等 | 有 | 中等 |
| T2 | 金黄 | 成熟 | 疏松 | 中等 | 有 | 中等 |
| T1 | 正黄 | 成熟 | 疏松 | 稍薄 | 有 | 中等 |
| 样品 | 等级 | 单叶质量/g | 叶长/cm | 叶宽/cm | 含梗率/% | 厚度/mm | 叶面密度/(g·m-²) | 拉力/N |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | C3F | 11.06±0.27b | 70.95±1.23b | 23.40±0.48b | 28.67±1.53b | 0.110±0.02b | 77.29±2.17a | 1.68±0.13b |
| T2 | 11.11±0.31b | 69.95±1.14b | 23.40±0.43b | 26.64±1.22c | 0.113±0.01b | 71.46±1.83b | 1.30±0.11c | |
| T3 | 11.73±0.36a | 73.45±1.47a | 25.40±0.58a | 31.29±1.82a | 0.120±0.01a | 54.68±2.53c | 2.30±0.18a | |
| T1 | B2F | 12.50±0.38b | 64.60±0.97a | 19.25±0.42b | 27.92±1.27a | 0.160±0.02a | 73.13±1.97a | 1.33±0.14b |
| T2 | 11.40±0.33c | 62.10±0.93b | 19.65±0.37b | 29.56±1.43a | 0.160±0.02a | 69.70±1.72b | 1.80±0.16a | |
| T3 | 12.87±0.44a | 63.40±1.12ab | 20.55±0.49a | 28.36±1.24a | 0.170±0.02a | 69.85±1.63b | 1.23±0.09b |
表3 ‘云烟87’不同处理下烤后烟叶样品相关物理指标
Table 3 Physical properties of 'Yunyan 87' after flue-curing under different nitrogen treatments
| 样品 | 等级 | 单叶质量/g | 叶长/cm | 叶宽/cm | 含梗率/% | 厚度/mm | 叶面密度/(g·m-²) | 拉力/N |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | C3F | 11.06±0.27b | 70.95±1.23b | 23.40±0.48b | 28.67±1.53b | 0.110±0.02b | 77.29±2.17a | 1.68±0.13b |
| T2 | 11.11±0.31b | 69.95±1.14b | 23.40±0.43b | 26.64±1.22c | 0.113±0.01b | 71.46±1.83b | 1.30±0.11c | |
| T3 | 11.73±0.36a | 73.45±1.47a | 25.40±0.58a | 31.29±1.82a | 0.120±0.01a | 54.68±2.53c | 2.30±0.18a | |
| T1 | B2F | 12.50±0.38b | 64.60±0.97a | 19.25±0.42b | 27.92±1.27a | 0.160±0.02a | 73.13±1.97a | 1.33±0.14b |
| T2 | 11.40±0.33c | 62.10±0.93b | 19.65±0.37b | 29.56±1.43a | 0.160±0.02a | 69.70±1.72b | 1.80±0.16a | |
| T3 | 12.87±0.44a | 63.40±1.12ab | 20.55±0.49a | 28.36±1.24a | 0.170±0.02a | 69.85±1.63b | 1.23±0.09b |
| 处理 | 产量/(kg·hm-2) | 均价/(元·kg-1) | 产值/(元·hm-2) | 中上等烟比例 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T3 | 1 924.5 | 30.1 | 57 927.45 | 96.6% |
| T2 | 1 792.5 | 28.8 | 51 624.00 | 92.5% |
| T1 | 1 626.0 | 28.1 | 45 690.60 | 90.6% |
表4 ‘云烟87’不同施氮处理组烟叶产量和产值
Table 4 Yield and economic return of 'Yunyan 87' under different nitrogen levels
| 处理 | 产量/(kg·hm-2) | 均价/(元·kg-1) | 产值/(元·hm-2) | 中上等烟比例 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T3 | 1 924.5 | 30.1 | 57 927.45 | 96.6% |
| T2 | 1 792.5 | 28.8 | 51 624.00 | 92.5% |
| T1 | 1 626.0 | 28.1 | 45 690.60 | 90.6% |
图3 致香成分对感官评价指标的贡献程度注:M1~M30分别表示2-呋喃甲醇、苯甲醇、反式香叶基香叶醇、糠醛、苯甲醛、苯乙醛、5-羟甲基糠醛、6-甲基-5-庚烯-2-酮、β-大马酮、香叶基丙酮、巨豆三烯酮、螺岩兰草酮、法尼基丙酮、3-羟基-β-达马斯科酮、7,9-二叔丁基-1-氧嘧啶(4,5)癸-6,9-二烯-2,8-二酮、2.3-二氢-3.5-二羟基-6-甲基-4H-吡喃-4-酮、3,5-二羟基-2-甲基-4H-吡喃-4-酮、4-(3-羟基-1-丁烯基)-3,5,5-三甲基-2-环己烯-1-酮、二氢猕猴桃内酯、棕榈酸甲酯、2-乙酰基吡咯、4-乙烯基-2-甲氧基苯酚、1,7,7-三甲基-三环[2.2.1.0(2,6)]庚烷、1,5-二乙基-3-甲基-2-亚甲基-(1,3,5)-环己烷、2,3'-二吡啶基、棕榈酸、9,12,15-十八碳三烯酸、9,12,15-十八三酸、硬脂酸、新植二烯、5-甲基-3-(1-甲基乙烯基)-环己烯、m-薄荷-4,8-二烯。
Fig. 3 Contribution of aroma compounds to sensory quality indicators
| [1] | 金亚波,陈天才,王克,等.追施N,K复合肥和K2SO4对烟草品种K326生长和抗病性的影响[J].植物医学,2022,1(1):26-34. |
| JIN Y B, CHEN T C, WANG K, et al.. The effect of N and K compound fertilizer and K2SO4 on the growth and disease resistance of tobacco variety K326[J]. Plant Health Med., 2022, 1(1): 26-34. | |
| [2] | LI F L, LU B B, YANG L N, et al.. Effects of partial replacement of chemical fertilizer by bio-organic fertilizer Kunyijian on yield and quality of tobacco leaves[J]. Asian Agric. Res., 2020,12(3): 42-46. |
| [3] | 柳渊博,王静,朱学杰,等.不同水肥管理模式对烤烟养分积累及烟叶品质的影响[J].中国农业科技导报,2021,23(9):193-201. |
| LIU Y B, WANG J, ZHU X J, et al.. Effects of different water and fertilizer management modes on nutrient accumulation and quality of flue-cured tobacco leaves[J]. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2021, 23(9): 193-201. | |
| [4] | 刘雅娴,杜传印,刘冰,等.不同施氮量下采收时间对烤烟经济性状及品质的影响[J].西南农业学报,2021,34(2):334-339. |
| LIU Y X, DU C Y, LIU B, et al.. Effects of harvesting time on economic characters and quality of flue-cured tobacco under different application amounts of nitrogen fertilizer[J]. Southwest China J. Agric. Sci., 2021, 34(2): 334-339. | |
| [5] | 符昌武,陆元,王祖富,等.不同施氮量与优化烟叶结构耦合研究[J].中国农学通报,2018,34(19):12-17. |
| FU C W, LU Y, WANG Z F, et al.. Coupling of different nitrogen application rates and optimization of tobacco structure[J]. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull., 2018, 34(19): 12-17. | |
| [6] | 赛子林,齐虹凌,李云,等.生物炭对植烟土壤养分及烤烟产质量的影响[J].生物技术进展,2024,14(2):271-277. |
| SAI Z L, QI H L, LI Y, et al.. Effects of biochar addition on soil nutrients, yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco[J]. Curr. Biotechnol., 2024, 14(2): 271-277. | |
| [7] | 郑登峰,陈懿,陈伟,等.烤烟株型与产量和质量的关系[J].土壤,2018,50(4):718-725. |
| ZHENG D F, CHEN Y, CHEN W, et al.. Relationship between plant type and yield & quality of flue-cured tobacco[J]. Soils, 2018, 50(4): 718-725. | |
| [8] | 邱岭军,李亮,张翔,等.有机无机氮肥用量与配比对土壤生物学特性及烟叶品质的影响[J].土壤通报,2020,51(4):920-927. |
| QIU L J, LI L, ZHANG X, et al.. Effects of dosage and ratio of organic and inorganic nitrogen fertilizers on soil biological characteristics and quality of tobacco leaves[J]. Chin. J. Soil Sci., 2020, 51(4): 920-927. | |
| [9] | 刘佳,戴林建,王勇,等.密度与施氮量对烤烟农艺性状及烟叶主要化学成分的互作效应[J].作物研究,2017,31(2):152-159. |
| LIU J, DAI L J, WANG Y, et al.. The interaction effect of density and N application rate on the main chemical composition and agronomic traits of flue-cured tobacco[J]. Crop Res., 2017, 31(2): 152-159. | |
| [10] | 张森,许自成,李京京,等.烟草碳氮代谢及其调控技术研究进展[J].生物技术进展,2016,6(5):312-318. |
| ZHANG S, XU Z C, LI J J, et al.. Advance on carbon and nitrogen metabolism and regulation of tobacco[J]. Curr. Biotechnol., 2016, 6(5): 312-318. | |
| [11] | 曹阳,文国宇,李茂军,等.种植密度对烤烟光合特性日变化及其主要化学成分的影响[J].南京农业大学学报,2019,42(4):641-647. |
| CAO Y, WEN G Y, LI M J, et al.. Effect of plant density on diurnal changes of photosynthetic characteristics and its main chemical components of flue-cured tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.)[J]. J. Nanjing Agric. Univ., 2019, 42(4): 641-647. | |
| [12] | 晏玲,刘棋,封幸兵,等.种植密度与施氮量对山地烟生长发育及烟叶品质特征的影响[J].云南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2020(5):810-817. |
| YAN L, LIU Q, FENG X B, et al.. Effects of planting density and nitrogen application rate on the growth and the quality characteristics of mountain tobacco[J]. J. Yunnan Agric. Univ. Nat. Sci., 2020(5): 810-817. | |
| [13] | 李天诚,王建民,欧明毅,等.打叶及复烤强度对烟叶致香成分的影响[J].湖北农业科学,2021,60(1):77-79. |
| LI T C, WANG J M, OU M Y, et al.. Effect of threshing and redrying intensity on aroma components of tobacco leaves[J]. Hubei Agric. Sci., 2021, 60(1): 77-79. | |
| [14] | CHEN C, CHEN H, ZHANG Y, et al.. TBtools: an integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data[J]. Mol. Plant, 2020, 13(8): 1194-1202. |
| [15] | MEVIK B H, WEHRENS R. TheplsPackage: principal component and partial least squares regression inR [J/OL]. J. Stat. Soft., 2007, 18(2): i02[2025-08-25]. . |
| [16] | 王娟,邓国宾,张晓龙,等.美引烤烟品种NC102品质特征分析[J].中国野生植物资源,2013,32(1):29-32. |
| WANG J, DENG G B, ZHANG X L, et al.. Analysis of the quality of flue-cured tobacco varieties NC102 introduced from the United States[J]. Chin. Wild Plant Resour., 2013, 32(1): 29-32. | |
| [17] | 邵惠芳,刘志宏,崔登科,等.基于氮素效应的烤烟叶面积指数动态模拟[J].中国生态农业学报,2017,25(9):1276-1286. |
| SHAO H F, LIU Z H, CUI D K, et al.. Dynamic simulation of leaf area index of tobacco based on nitrogen effect[J]. Chin. J. Eco Agric., 2017, 25(9): 1276-1286. | |
| [18] | SHAO X H, WANG W N, CHANG T T, et al.. Effects of different nitrogen levels on the yield and water use efficiency of tobacco[J]. Adv. Mater. Res., 2012, 610-613: 133-137. |
| [19] | 孙敬钊,白玉超,皮本阳,等.不同氮肥用量对烤烟生长发育及品质的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2016,44(5):42-43. |
| SUN J Z, BAI Y C, PI B Y, et al.. Effects of different dosages of nitrogen fertilizers on the develoment and quality of flue-cured tobacco[J]. J. Anhui Agric. Sci., 2016, 44(5): 42-43. | |
| [20] | 汪代斌,周开燕,钟维勇,等.施氮量、种植密度及留叶数对重庆烟区云烟116生长和产质量的影响[J].西南农业学报,2019,32(12):2769-2775. |
| WANG D B, ZHOU K Y, ZHONG W Y, et al.. Effects of nitrogen amount, planting density and number of leaves on plant growth, yield and output value of flue-cured tobacco variety Yunyan116 in Chongqing[J]. Southwest China J. Agric. Sci., 2019, 32(12): 2769-2775. | |
| [21] | 王玉林,孙延国,高峻,等.施氮量与种植密度对'中烟100'烟叶产量及化学成分的影响[J].山东农业科学,2022,54(7):113-121+134. |
| WANG Y L, SUN Y G, GAO J, et al.. Effects of nitrogen application rate and planting density on yield and chemical components of flue-cured tobacco zhongyan 100 leaves[J]. Shandong Agric. Sci., 2022, 54(7): 113-121+134. | |
| [22] | 尹冬,张勇江,李纪宁,等.施氮量对烤烟生长发育及产质量形成的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2015,43(16):120-123. |
| YIN D, ZHANG Y J, LI J N, et al.. Effects of N application on growth and formation of yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco[J]. J. Anhui Agric. Sci., 2015, 43(16): 120-123. | |
| [23] | 吴佳溶,徐茜,陈志厚,等.施氮量与种植密度对烟草品种CB-1生长及产质量的影响[J].贵州农业科学,2017,45(2):67-70. |
| WU J R, XU Q, CHEN Z H, et al.. Effects of nitrogen application rate and planting density on growth, yield and quality of CB-1, a tobacco variety[J]. Guizhou Agric. Sci., 2017, 45(2): 67-70. | |
| [24] | 刘国顺.烟草栽培学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2003. |
| [25] | 张锐新.移栽期、施氮量及晾制密度对海南雪茄烟品质影响研究[D].郑州:河南农业大学,2018. |
| [26] | 冯光群,王仕海,张长华,等.不同施氮量对烤烟产质量的影响[J].贵州农业科学,2000(S1):49-54. |
| FENG G Q, WANG S H, ZHANG C H, et al.. Effects of different nitrogen application rates on the yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco[J]. Guizhou Agric. Sci., 2000(S1): 49-54. | |
| [27] | 苑举民,张忠锋,石屹,等.低肥力土壤施氮对烤烟干物质积累、氮素吸收及产质量的影响[J].中国烟草科学,2009,30(4):47-51. |
| YUAN J M, ZHANG Z F, SHI Y, et al.. Effects of nitrogen application on dry matter accumulation, nitrogen uptake, yield, and quality of flue-cured tobacco in low fertilility soil[J]. Chin. Tob. Sci., 2009, 30(4): 47-51. | |
| [28] | 黄学跃,张晨东,杨智林,等.有机肥对晒烟生理生化特性的影响[J].烟草科技,2003,36(4):32-34. |
| HUANG X Y, ZHANG C D, YANG Z L, et al.. Effects of organic fertilizers on physiologic and biochemical characteristics of Sun-cured tobacco[J]. Tob. Sci. Technol., 2003, 36(4): 32-34. | |
| [29] | 雷洋.不同施肥处理对铁岭植烟土壤性状及烟草生长与品质的影响[D].沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2022. |
| [30] | 何明昌,刘利平,李继红,等.施氮量和移栽密度及其互作对雪茄烟产量及其品质的影响[J].湖北农业科学,2021,60(16):117-121. |
| HE M C, LIU L P, LI J H, et al.. Effects of cooperation of nitrogen amount and planting density on the production and quality of cigar[J]. Hubei Agric. Sci., 2021, 60(16): 117-121. | |
| [31] | 王广山,朱尊权,尹启生,等.氮肥用量对白肋烟产质的影响[J].烟草科技,2000,33(12):34-37. |
| WANG G S, ZHU Z Q, YIN Q S, et al.. Effect of the amount of N fertilizer applied on the yield and quality of burley tobacco[J]. Tob. Sci. Technol., 2000, 33(12): 34-37. | |
| [32] | 邓小华,蔡兴,于庆涛,等.增密和减氮对稻茬烤烟物理性状的效应分析[J].烟草科技,2016,49(10):23-30. |
| DENG X H, CAI X, YU Q T, et al.. Effects of increased planting density and reduced nitrogen on physical properties of flue-cured tobacco rotated in rice paddy field[J]. Tob. Sci. Technol., 2016, 49(10): 23-30. | |
| [33] | 王斌斌.氮肥用量对雪茄烟叶产量及品质的影响[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2023. |
| [34] | 齐永杰,邓小华,徐文兵,等.种植密度和施氮量对上部烟叶物理性状的影响效应分析[J].中国农业科技导报,2016,18(6):129-137. |
| QI Y J, DENG X H, XU W B, et al.. Effective analysis of planting density and nitrogen levels on physical properties of upper paddy-tobacco[J]. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2016, 18(6): 129-137. | |
| [35] | KRISHNA REDDY S V, KRISHNA S K, REDDY D D, et al.. Productivity, leaf quality and nutrient-use efficiency of FCV tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) genotypes to levels of N and K application under irrigated Alfisols of Andhra Pradesh[J]. Indian J. Agron., 2017, 62: 510-518. |
| [36] | 谢晋,严玛丽,陈建军,等.不同铵态氮硝态氮配比对烤烟产量、质量及其主要化学成分的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2014,20(4):1030-1037. |
| XIE J, YAN M L, CHEN J J, et al.. Effect of nitrogen forms on yield, quality and main chemical components of flue-cured tobacco[J]. J. Plant Nutr. Fertil., 2014, 20(4): 1030-1037. | |
| [37] | 陈华,赵文军,王正旭,等.不同轮作模式下氮素调控对烤烟产质量及氮肥利用的影响[J].河南农业科学,2021,50(9):87-95. |
| CHEN H, ZHAO W J, WANG Z X, et al.. Effects of nitrogen management on yield, quality and nitrogen utilization of flue-cured tobacco under different rotation patterns[J]. J. Henan Agric. Sci., 2021, 50(9): 87-95. | |
| [38] | 易建华,张新要,蒲文宣,等.氮素用量及有机无机肥料配比对烤烟产质量的影响[J].中国农学通报,2006,22(6):233-236. |
| YI J H, ZHANG X Y, PU W X, et al.. Effects of different nitrogen levels and proportions of inorganic and organic fertilizer on yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco[J]. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull., 2006, 22(6): 233-236. | |
| [39] | 汤宏,张杨珠,李向阳,等.不同施氮量对烟草生长及产量的影响[J].湖南农业科学,2018(11):63-67. |
| TANG H, ZHANG Y Z, LI X Y, et al.. Effects of different nitrogen application rate on the growth and yield of tobacco[J]. Hunan Agric. Sci., 2018(11): 63-67. |
| [1] | 季嫱, 吴娜, 郑超, 孙志康, 吴晗, 李选文, 郝捷. 烟草中绿原酸的生物合成与应用研究进展[J]. 生物技术进展, 2025, 15(6): 933-943. |
| [2] | 汪苏洁, 顾梦丽, 陶界锰, 童治军, 郭俊佳, 金静静, 徐梦晓, 孟利军, 张剑锋, 曹培健, 卢鹏. 烟草疫霉拮抗菌XC-29的分离鉴定及其全基因组序列分析[J]. 生物技术进展, 2024, 14(6): 1004-1015. |
| [3] | 夏琳, 徐向丽, 王雪云, 杨军, 武明珠, 宋卫武. 植物绿原酸生物合成研究进展[J]. 生物技术进展, 2024, 14(6): 973-979. |
| [4] | 王博文, 王金星, 邱成尧, 秦庆宪, 王菊香, 姚博, 李红艳, 谭官鑫, 杨应伟, 姬广海. 贝莱斯芽孢杆菌联合含钙土壤调理剂对烟草青枯病的防治[J]. 生物技术进展, 2024, 14(5): 839-847. |
| [5] | 郝捷, 季嫱, 李力群, 郑超, 吴娜, 吴晗, 李选文, 孙志康. 生物酶和微生物技术改善烟叶香气的研究进展[J]. 生物技术进展, 2022, 12(6): 817-824. |
| [6] | 王金棒, 邱纪青, 汪志波, 李凌, 卢志菁, 邹珺, 陈彦. 烟草废弃物在堆肥领域的研究进展[J]. 生物技术进展, 2022, 12(5): 711-720. |
| [7] | 肖克, 周晓今, 陈茹梅, 逄森. 玉米中ClassⅠ和ClassⅡ NAS蛋白之间的BiFC互作研究[J]. 生物技术进展, 2022, 12(5): 728-736. |
| [8] | 顾韩雪,刘玥,陈子奇,刘艳芝,刘相国,郝东云,. 过表达玉米Zmsh1基因提高转基因烟草的生物量[J]. 生物技术进展, 2017, 7(3): 203-210. |
| [9] | 张森,许自成,李京京,陈征,方秀. 烟草碳氮代谢及其调控技术研究进展[J]. 生物技术进展, 2016, 6(5): 312-318. |
| [10] | 丁云双,曾亚文,闵康,易斌. 藜麦功能成分综合研究与利用[J]. 生物技术进展, 2015, 5(5): 340-346. |
| [11] | 刘鹏, 郭智慧, 陈旭, 郭良海, 田宇兵, 邸天梅, 王富延. 赤霉素在小麦发育及胁迫响应中的作用研究进展[J]. 生物技术进展, 2015, 5(4): 253-258. |
| [12] | 陈征,宋鹏飞,朱金峰,黄五星,许自成,马一琼. 烟草镉的富集及防控措施研究进展[J]. 生物技术进展, 2015, 5(4): 265-271. |
| [13] | 谢永辉,张永贵,朱利全,尤道贵,鲁耀. 烟草黑胫病综合防治研究进展[J]. 生物技术进展, 2015, 5(1): 41-46. |
| [14] | 田俊岭,彭桂香,李永涛,谭志远,杨盼盼,张海春,刘丽辉,陈旭东. 一种高效光合菌剂对辣椒生长及土壤微生物的影响[J]. 生物技术进展, 2014, 4(3): 197-200. |
| [15] | 赵文军, 杨继周, 胡保文, 常剑. 抗旱相关基因在烟草中的应用研究进展[J]. 生物技术进展, 2012, 2(4): 240-248. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||