Current Biotechnology ›› 2023, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (3): 441-448.DOI: 10.19586/j.2095-2341.2022.0177
• Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
Lihua ZHANG(
), Yifan WANG, Xuyang ZHANG, Qianying LIU, Siqi GAO, Jian JIAO(
)
Received:2022-11-02
Accepted:2023-04-28
Online:2023-05-25
Published:2023-06-12
Contact:
Jian JIAO
张立华(
), 王一樊, 张旭阳, 刘千盈, 高思琦, 焦健(
)
通讯作者:
焦健
作者简介:张立华 E-mail: zlh20083395@163.com;
基金资助:CLC Number:
Lihua ZHANG, Yifan WANG, Xuyang ZHANG, Qianying LIU, Siqi GAO, Jian JIAO. Optimization of Enzymatic Extraction Process of Salidroside by Response Surface Analysis[J]. Current Biotechnology, 2023, 13(3): 441-448.
张立华, 王一樊, 张旭阳, 刘千盈, 高思琦, 焦健. 响应面分析法优化酶法提取红景天苷的工艺研究[J]. 生物技术进展, 2023, 13(3): 441-448.
| 水平 | 因素 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 酶用量/% | 酶解pH | 酶解时间/min | 料液比 | 酶解温度/℃ | |
| 1 | 0.25 | 4.5 | 90 | 1∶15 | 50 |
| 2 | 0.50 | 5.0 | 120 | 1∶20 | 60 |
Table 1 Factors and levels of orthogonal experimental design
| 水平 | 因素 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 酶用量/% | 酶解pH | 酶解时间/min | 料液比 | 酶解温度/℃ | |
| 1 | 0.25 | 4.5 | 90 | 1∶15 | 50 |
| 2 | 0.50 | 5.0 | 120 | 1∶20 | 60 |
| 因素 | 水平 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| -1 | 0 | 1 | |
| A:酶用量/% | 0.05 | 0.25 | 0.45 |
| B:酶解温度/℃ | 40 | 50 | 60 |
| C:酶解pH | 3 | 5 | 7 |
Table 2 Factors and levels of RSM design
| 因素 | 水平 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| -1 | 0 | 1 | |
| A:酶用量/% | 0.05 | 0.25 | 0.45 |
| B:酶解温度/℃ | 40 | 50 | 60 |
| C:酶解pH | 3 | 5 | 7 |
| 序号 | 因素 | 红景天苷/% | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A:酶用量/% | B:酶解pH | C:酶解时间/min | D:料液比 | E:酶解温度/℃ | ||
| 1 | 0.25 | 4.5 | 90 | 1∶15 | 50 | 0.84 |
| 2 | 0.25 | 4.5 | 120 | 1∶20 | 60 | 1.28 |
| 3 | 0.25 | 5.0 | 120 | 1∶15 | 60 | 1.21 |
| 4 | 0.25 | 5.0 | 90 | 1∶20 | 50 | 1.35 |
| 5 | 0.50 | 4.5 | 120 | 1∶15 | 50 | 0.66 |
| 6 | 0.50 | 4.5 | 90 | 1∶20 | 60 | 0.86 |
| 7 | 0.50 | 5.0 | 90 | 1∶15 | 60 | 1.08 |
| 8 | 0.50 | 5.0 | 120 | 1∶20 | 50 | 0.85 |
| k1 | 1.17 | 0.91 | 1.032 5 | 0.947 5 | 0.925 | |
| k2 | 0.862 5 | 1.122 5 | 1 | 1.085 | 1.107 5 | |
| R | 0.307 5 | 0.212 5 | 0.032 5 | 0.137 5 | 0.182 5 | |
Table 3 Orthogonal experimental design and results of analysis
| 序号 | 因素 | 红景天苷/% | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A:酶用量/% | B:酶解pH | C:酶解时间/min | D:料液比 | E:酶解温度/℃ | ||
| 1 | 0.25 | 4.5 | 90 | 1∶15 | 50 | 0.84 |
| 2 | 0.25 | 4.5 | 120 | 1∶20 | 60 | 1.28 |
| 3 | 0.25 | 5.0 | 120 | 1∶15 | 60 | 1.21 |
| 4 | 0.25 | 5.0 | 90 | 1∶20 | 50 | 1.35 |
| 5 | 0.50 | 4.5 | 120 | 1∶15 | 50 | 0.66 |
| 6 | 0.50 | 4.5 | 90 | 1∶20 | 60 | 0.86 |
| 7 | 0.50 | 5.0 | 90 | 1∶15 | 60 | 1.08 |
| 8 | 0.50 | 5.0 | 120 | 1∶20 | 50 | 0.85 |
| k1 | 1.17 | 0.91 | 1.032 5 | 0.947 5 | 0.925 | |
| k2 | 0.862 5 | 1.122 5 | 1 | 1.085 | 1.107 5 | |
| R | 0.307 5 | 0.212 5 | 0.032 5 | 0.137 5 | 0.182 5 | |
| 实验编号 | A:酶用量/% | B:酶解温度/℃ | C:酶解pH | 红景天苷/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.38 |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.38 |
| 3 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 1.22 |
| 4 | -1 | 0 | -1 | 1.03 |
| 5 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 1.01 |
| 6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.97 |
| 7 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 1.31 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.46 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.35 |
| 10 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0.98 |
| 11 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 1.10 |
| 12 | 0 | -1 | 1 | 1.20 |
| 13 | 0 | -1 | -1 | 1.11 |
| 14 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1.31 |
| 15 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1.02 |
| 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.47 |
| 17 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 1.01 |
Table 4 Design and results of RSM
| 实验编号 | A:酶用量/% | B:酶解温度/℃ | C:酶解pH | 红景天苷/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.38 |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.38 |
| 3 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 1.22 |
| 4 | -1 | 0 | -1 | 1.03 |
| 5 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 1.01 |
| 6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.97 |
| 7 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 1.31 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.46 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.35 |
| 10 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0.98 |
| 11 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 1.10 |
| 12 | 0 | -1 | 1 | 1.20 |
| 13 | 0 | -1 | -1 | 1.11 |
| 14 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1.31 |
| 15 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1.02 |
| 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.47 |
| 17 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 1.01 |
| 来源 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方 | F值 | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 模型 | 0.47 | 9 | 0.053 | 11.53 | 0.002 0 |
| A:酶用量 | 0.028 | 1 | 0.028 | 6.06 | 0.043 4 |
| B:酶解温度 | 0.024 | 1 | 0.024 | 5.31 | 0.054 6 |
| C:酶解pH | 9.113E-003 | 1 | 9.113E-003 | 2.00 | 0.200 3 |
| AB | 0.063 | 1 | 0.063 | 13.71 | 0.007 6 |
| AC | 0.013 | 1 | 0.013 | 2.90 | 0.132 3 |
| BC | 2.500E-003 | 1 | 2.500E-003 | 0.55 | 0.483 0 |
| A² | 0.051 | 1 | 0.051 | 11.23 | 0.012 2 |
| B² | 0.10 | 1 | 0.10 | 22.99 | 0.002 0 |
| C² | 0.14 | 1 | 0.14 | 31.70 | 0.000 8 |
| 残差 | 0.032 | 7 | 4.558E-003 | ||
| 失拟项 | 0.020 | 3 | 6.808E-003 | 2.37 | 0.211 3 |
| 绝对误差 | 0.011 | 4 | 2.870E-003 | ||
| 总误差 | 0.50 | 16 | |||
| R2=0.936 8 | C.V.%=5.65 |
Table 5 The analysis of variance on yield
| 来源 | 平方和 | 自由度 | 均方 | F值 | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 模型 | 0.47 | 9 | 0.053 | 11.53 | 0.002 0 |
| A:酶用量 | 0.028 | 1 | 0.028 | 6.06 | 0.043 4 |
| B:酶解温度 | 0.024 | 1 | 0.024 | 5.31 | 0.054 6 |
| C:酶解pH | 9.113E-003 | 1 | 9.113E-003 | 2.00 | 0.200 3 |
| AB | 0.063 | 1 | 0.063 | 13.71 | 0.007 6 |
| AC | 0.013 | 1 | 0.013 | 2.90 | 0.132 3 |
| BC | 2.500E-003 | 1 | 2.500E-003 | 0.55 | 0.483 0 |
| A² | 0.051 | 1 | 0.051 | 11.23 | 0.012 2 |
| B² | 0.10 | 1 | 0.10 | 22.99 | 0.002 0 |
| C² | 0.14 | 1 | 0.14 | 31.70 | 0.000 8 |
| 残差 | 0.032 | 7 | 4.558E-003 | ||
| 失拟项 | 0.020 | 3 | 6.808E-003 | 2.37 | 0.211 3 |
| 绝对误差 | 0.011 | 4 | 2.870E-003 | ||
| 总误差 | 0.50 | 16 | |||
| R2=0.936 8 | C.V.%=5.65 |
| 1 | 任卫合, 王丽萍, 罗龙龙, 等. 不同品种红景天矿物元素特征及与有效成分相关性研究[J]. 中药材, 2021, 44(12):2781-2786. |
| 2 | 吕秀梅, 范芳芳, 文检, 等. HPLC法同时测定3种红景天药材中5种化学成分的含量[J]. 中国药房, 2018, 29(18):2515-2519. |
| 3 | 国家药典委员会.中国药典(2022年版)[M].北京:中国医药科技出版社, 2022:161-162. |
| 4 | 于然, 陈亮, 王晓杰. UHPLC MS-QQQ同时测定红景天中4种有效活性成分研究[J]. 中国食品添加剂, 2019, 30(8):154-157. |
| 5 | 王彤, 苏鑫. 红景天苷药理作用研究进展[J]. 内蒙古中医药, 2018, 37(2):102-104. |
| 6 | CHEN X, KOU Y. Salidroside ameliorated hypoxia-induced tumorigenesis of BxPC-3 cells via downregulating hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1α and LOXL2[J]. J. Cell Biochem., 2020, 121(1): 165-173. |
| 7 | WANG H, LI Q, SUN S, et al.. Neuroprotective effects of salidroside in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease[J]. Cell Mol. Neurobiol., 2020, 40(7): 1133-1142. |
| 8 | XING S S, YANG J. Salidroside decreases atherosclerosis plaqueformation via inhibiting endothelial cell pyroptosis[J]. Inflammation, 2020, 43(2): 433-440. |
| 9 | 张佳琦. 红景天中红景天苷的提取及化学合成[D]. 天津:天津科技大学, 2018. |
| 10 | 赵兵兵, 李涛, 闫咏梅. 红景天苷及其苷元酪醇抗炎作用研究进展[J]. 转化医学电子杂志, 2018, 5(8):55-58. |
| 11 | 方碧烟, 甘均龙, 史军杰, 等. 不同产地红景天破壁饮片、破壁粉体和传统饮片HPLC指纹图谱相关性研究[J]. 现代中药研究与实践, 2021, 35(1):33-37. |
| 12 | 刘庆焕, 王宏, 张婷, 等. 多指标正交试验优化复方红景天颗粒的提取工艺[J]. 中国药房, 2017, 28(13):1830-1833. |
| 13 | 郭娜, 张宇婷, 张颖智, 等. 响应面法优化红景天苷提取工艺研究[J]. 粮食与油脂, 2021, 34(12):103-107. |
| 14 | 黄钰芳, 李越峰, 袁菊丽, 等. 正交设计-多元回归法优选红景天中红景天苷超声波提取工艺[J]. 中国药房, 2015, 26(22):3128-3130. |
| 15 | 高伟, 李凤林, 李光耀, 等. 响应面法优化红景天苷超声波辅助提取工艺[J]. 粮食与油脂, 2018, 31(8):79-82. |
| 16 | 郭青锋, 王凤薇, 陈东辉, 等. 双水相萃取红景天苷的研究[J]. 四川大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 53(2):403-408. |
| 17 | 何自强, 张惠玲, 苏天明. 响应面法优化超声波辅助乙醇-K2HPO4双水相提取红景天苷[J]. 天然产物研究与开发, 2018, 30(7):1257-1265. |
| 18 | 董彦莉, 赵超. 纤维素酶酶解法提取红景天苷效果的研究[J]. 广东农业科学, 2011, 38(19):103-104. |
| 19 | 岳显文. 高山红景天有效成分提取工艺优化[J]. 医疗装备, 2016, 29(18):113-114. |
| 20 | 孙云波, 沈硕, 张创峰, 等. 四川洪坝乡红景天HPLC指纹图谱研究[J]. 中国医药导报, 2020, 17(4):23-27. |
| 21 | 杨建霞, 师雪梅, 曹源沅, 等. 酶解法提取葡萄叶白藜芦醇及抑菌活性研究[J]. 陇东学院学报, 2023, 34(2):106-111. |
| 22 | 陈巍, 秦凤贤, 姜云瑶, 等. 纤维素酶法提取酸枣仁总黄酮工艺的研究[J]. 粮食与油脂, 2018, 31(8):87-91. |
| 23 | 张睿, 王湘, 王玥琦, 等. 多因素响应面法优化红景天抗氧化有效物质提取工艺[J]. 世界中医药, 2020, 15(14):2019-2025. |
| 24 | 程朗, 陈红玲, 徐蓓蓓, 等. 响应面优化超声辅助酶法提取石榴皮多糖的工艺[J]. 农产品加工, 2022, 19:58-63. |
| 25 | 杜若君, 石召华, 詹志来, 等. 响应面法优化金莲花总酚酸的提取工艺及其美白活性研究[J]. 天然产物研究与开发,2012, 8:1-17. |
| 26 | 郭建鹏, 张红梅. 高山红景天酶解工艺研究[J]. 中国中药杂志, 2007, 17:1817-1819. |
| 27 | 王军民, 陈永虎, 包彦强, 等. 超声法与闪式提取法提取红景天苷的工艺对比试验[J]. 中国兽医杂志, 2020, 56(11):105-108. |
| [1] | Xiaojing GAO, Zhulan ZHANG, Xianju LIN, Guanrong QIU, Yaoming WEN, Jianhui FAN, Hongxiang HUANG. Optimization of Fermentation Culture Conditions for Cyclosporine A Using Response Surface Method [J]. Current Biotechnology, 2025, 15(3): 518-525. |
| [2] | Jin WANG, Jing BAI, Jing ZHAO, Jian TIAN, Wei ZHANG, Yuan WANG, Haomeng YANG, Meishan SHI, Beibei ZHANG, Xinxin XU, Huoqing HUANG. Intelligent Mining of Novel GH45 Cellulases and its Efficient Expression in Trichoderma reesei [J]. Current Biotechnology, 2025, 15(2): 287-295. |
| [3] | Mengmeng KONG, Jingjing JIN, Peng LU, Mengli GU, Qiansi CHEN, Peijian CAO, Jianfeng ZHANG, Jiemeng TAO. Optimization of Enzyme Production Conditions of High-yielding Cellulase Engineering Strains [J]. Current Biotechnology, 2024, 14(6): 1032-1041. |
| [4] | Jie HAO, Xuanwen LI, Bao ZHANG, Chao ZHENG, Zhikang SUN, Qiang JI, Na WU, Han WU, Liqun LI. Application Progress of Cellulase in Tobacco [J]. Current Biotechnology, 2023, 13(2): 166-173. |
| [5] | Lei LIU, Xinyue ZHOU, Zhen ZHU, Ye CAO, Wenbin WANG. Prokaryotic Expression of Outer Membrane Ferritin Receptor pvuA Gene of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Optimization of Induction Conditions for Product [J]. Current Biotechnology, 2022, 12(3): 396-404. |
| [6] | ZHANG Qingcui, SHI Yali*, LIU Anli, HU Jianhua, LI Yongli, SUN Yachao, HE Kexin, XIA Ting, BAO Yanbin. Research and Application Progress of Exocellulase [J]. Curr. Biotech., 2020, 10(5): 495-502. |
| [7] | YAN Hailin1,2,3, ZHU Zongcai1,2,3, ZHANG Wangbin1,2, DU Peixiu3, ZHANG Chao3, ZHAO Wenjun4, LI Weimin3*. Identification of Two Sec-dependent Cellulases in Erwinia amylovora and Gene Expression Analysis During Infection of Immature Pear Fruit [J]. Curr. Biotech., 2020, 10(5): 517-523. |
| [8] | LI Lijuan1, XIA Wenjing2, MA Guiping1 . Study on Optimum Process Conditions Immobilized Cellulase with Carbon Nanotubes [J]. Curr. Biotech., 2020, 10(4): 426-431. |
| [9] | CHEN Yuan1,2, LI Jinyang2, ZHANG Yuhong2, LIU Bo2, ZHANG Zhiwei1*, XU Xinxin2*, ZHANG Wei2. Identification and Analysis of a Cellulase Hyperproducing Mutant of Humicola insolens [J]. Curr. Biotech., 2019, 9(2): 185-190. |
| [10] | HU Qinhan, WANG Wei, LUO Yingbiao, DU Fang, YANG Liuqing, ZHAO Ting* . Optimization of Ultrasonic Assisted Enzymatic Extraction of Polysaccharide from Kadsura longipedunculata by Response Surface Analysis [J]. Curr. Biotech., 2018, 8(4): 351-357. |
| [11] | WANG Jiayou, ZHAO Pengnian, YANG Deyu, LONG Jingjing, ZHOU Yue, WANG Yuan*. Screening and Identification of a Cellulose Decomposing Fungus and its Degradation Effect on Corn Straw [J]. Curr. Biotech., 2018, 8(2): 132-139. |
| [12] | ZHENG Daheng1,2, WANG Wei2, LI Qian2, CHEN Yao3, ZHANG Weijie2, ZHAO Ting4, YANG Liuqing4*. Optimization on Extraction Technology of Polysaccharides from Hibiscus sabdariffa by Response Surface Methodology and Evaluation of its Antioxidant Activity [J]. Curr. Biotech., 2018, 8(2): 161-168. |
| [13] | DENG Chunmeng1, LI Qian2, WANG Wei2, ZHANG Weijie2, YU Ping3, MAO Guanghua1*, ZHAO Ting3, FENG Weiwei1, YANG Liuqing3, WU Xiangyang1*. Optimization of Extraction of Water-soluble Selenium-containing Protein from Se-enriched Maitake by Response Surface Methodology [J]. Curr. Biotech., 2017, 7(3): 247-252. |
| [14] | HUANG Lina1, LIU Huan2, ZHANG Fenqiang2, JIANG Mengyan1, YU Yue1, ZHOU Yijie2, ZHOU Wangyan1, XUE Feiyan1, MA Lanqing1,3*. Progress of Biosynthesis Mechanism and Genetic Engineering of Salidroside [J]. Curr. Biotech., 2017, 7(2): 106-110. |
| [15] | HAN Xiao, YAN Pei-sheng*, SHI Cui-juan, YANG Shu-yan, LI Yong-peng, ZOU Xue-ping. Research Progress on Cellulase Producing by Marine Microorganisms and its Application [J]. Curr. Biotech., 2015, 5(3): 191-195. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||